Dr. Meryl Nass Below Assault for “Spreading Misinformation”

This story is a few hero physician and a human being of nice braveness and integrity, Dr. Meryl Nass — who’s an internist in Maine with confirmed experience in hard-to-treat power diseases in addition to bioterrorism and epidemics.

I lately had the privilege of conducting an in depth interview with the courageous Dr. Nass. I’m together with the total transcript on the finish of this text for many who wish to learn transcripts. By the best way, once I initially printed the interview, YouTube deleted the video in lower than 5 minutes. Dr. Nass have to be onto one thing!

Dr. Nass’ plight defending the sanctity of science and doctor-patient relationship is for all of us. Could her victory over the attackers come rapidly and be strong — and should it stand in the best way of the Nice Reset.

Dr. Nass is beneath an assault for being outspoken and dependable to her medical calling. Not too long ago, Dr. Nass’ medical license was suspended by the state medical board in Maine for “spreading misinformation” and prescribing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Not solely that, she was additionally ordered to bear a neuro-psychological analysis, Soviet model.

Who Is Dr. Nass?

Dr. Nass is a health care provider with a stellar status and an extended profession beneath her belt. Right here is an excerpt of her bio from her pre-COVID testimony:

“Dr. Meryl Nass earned her BS in Biology from MIT and her MD from the College of Mississippi in 1980 … She is a board-certified Internist in Maine recognized for experience in anthrax, bioterrorism, anthrax vaccine and Gulf Conflict syndrome. She recognized the primary fashionable use of anthrax as a organic weapon, which occurred in 1978 throughout the Rhodesian Civil Conflict.

She has testified for seven Congressional committees on bioterrorism vaccines, the anthrax letters and Gulf Conflict syndrome. She has consulted for the Director of Nationwide Intelligence and the World Financial institution on the prevention and mitigation of bioterrorism.”

For extra element, you possibly can try Dr. Nass’ full CV.

What is the Alleged “Crime”?

All complaints towards Dr. Nass appear ideological in nature, and none of them got here from her sufferers or their members of the family — however from web strangers and establishment-minded medical employees.

Two of the complaints offered to Dr. Nass had been from random individuals who noticed her movies and mentioned that she was “spreading misinformation.” When Dr. Nass requested a clarification on what precisely constituted “misinformation” she was allegedly spreading — and what she was being requested to defend herself towards — no clarification was offered.

One other criticism was about prescribing hydroxychloroquine to a weak COVID affected person and mendacity to the pharmacist about what illness it was for. In fact, the rationale Dr. Nass was compelled to misinform the pharmacist was to assist the affected person, for the reason that pharmacists in Maine had been instructed to not dispense hydroxychloroquine for COVID — and so Dr. Nass selected to not betray her affected person’s pursuits and misinform the pharmacist as an alternative.

Any certainly one of us would desire a conscientious physician like that! Not solely was her lie a white one — she additionally notified the Board about it 5 minutes after she did it — telling them that the restrictions imposed on physicians had been unacceptable.

One other criticism was about prescribing ivermectin to a affected person who didn’t get a lot better from ivermectin and needed to go to the hospital. The affected person survived and had no complaints about Dr. Nass in any respect. At no level did Dr. Nass hurt the affected person or proclaim that ivermectin was a panacea.

She is an sincere physician, and panaceas don’t exist. She was simply doing her greatest to deal with the affected person — and the affected person, once more, had no complaints about her. It is the apparatchiks who discovered points with Dr. Nass’ prescription.

One other criticism was about prescribing hydroxychloroquine to a pregnant affected person. The medical employee who complained instructed that as an alternative, monoclonal antibodies needed to be prescribed. Stated medical employee someway did not know that hydroxychloroquine was authorized in being pregnant, whereas monoclonal antibodies weren’t.

Dr. Nass Raised the Alarm Concerning the Use of Close to-Deadly Dosages of HCQ in Official Research

In June 2020, Dr. Nass wrote a seminal article wherein she shared her findings on the usage of doubtlessly deadly dosages of hydroxychloroquine in each the WHO-sponsored “Solidarity” trial and the “Restoration” trial within the UK (after which additionally within the “Remap” examine). Not solely did she elevate the alarm about it, she additionally wrote to Tedros and different officers — and three days after her letter, the WHO trial was stopped. Right here is a good overview of what occurred:

“Dr. Meryl Nass has uncovered a hornet’s nest of presidency sponsored Hydroxychloroquine experiments that had been designed to kill severely sick, Covid-19 hospitalized sufferers.

On June 14th [2020] Dr. Nass first recognized two Covid-19 experiments wherein large, excessive poisonous doses – 4 instances increased than normal of hydroxychloroquine had been being given to severely sick hospitalized sufferers in intensive care models.

Solidarity was being performed by the World Well being Group, on 3500 Covid-19 sufferers at 400 hospitals, throughout 35 international locations. The hydroxychloroquine arm of the trial was suspended Could twenty fifth following the fraudulent Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35% increased loss of life charges in sufferers receiving Hydroxychloroquine.

However when The Lancet retracted the report, the WHO resumed the Solidarity trial’s hydroxychloroquine arm, on June third. Greater than 100 international locations expressed curiosity in taking part within the trial.

Restoration is an analogous experimental trial performed within the UK, utilizing very comparable doses. It was sponsored by the Wellcome Belief (GlaxoSmithKline) and the Invoice and Melinda Gates Basis and the UK authorities. The experiment was performed at Oxford College, on 1,542 sufferers of those 396 sufferers (25.7%) died.”

Later, “Dr. Nass uncovered a 3rd, “Even Worse” hydroxychloroquine experiment. REMAP targets sufferers who’re on a ventilator, or in shock – i.e., close to loss of life. Such sufferers are hardly able to giving consent. Slightly than trying to save lots of their lives, they’re getting used given a number of excessive doses of hydroxychloroquine and different medicine whose mixture is contraindicated.”

Within the interview I performed lately with Dr. Nass, she talks about how utilizing these dosages couldn’t have been a mistake. The one phrase that involves my thoughts is “premeditated homicide.” Dr. Nass, then again, is a hero who’s loyal to the medical career and never afraid to place herself on the road to save lots of lives. And I believe that had the bosses of the individuals waging an assault on Dr. Nass gotten actually sick, they’d be begging her to be their physician — and not begging Dr. Fauci.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who wrote a best-selling e-book about Dr. Fauci, “The Actual Anthony Fauci”, additionally interviewed Dr. Nass on this matter which you’ll see within the video beneath.

Exposing the Lab Origin of the Pathogen

As early as in March of 2020, Dr. Nass proposed that the pathogen we all know right this moment as “SARS-CoV-2” was doubtless made within the lab.

When the now infamous Nature examine come out, “proving” the pure origin of the virus, Dr. Nass instructed that it was both ghost-written or closely “guided” — and her concept was later strongly supported by Fauci emails.

Right here can be a current submit from Dr. Nass, titled, “Scientists Who Have been Instrumental to COVID-19 ‘Pure Origins’ Narrative Obtained Over $50 Million in NIAID Funding in 2020-2021/ Epoch Instances“:

“4 outstanding scientists who performed key roles in shaping the general public narrative across the origin of COVID-19 acquired substantial will increase in grant cash from the Nationwide Institute of Allergy and Infectious Ailments (NIAID), headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, within the subsequent two years, a overview of funding information by The Epoch Instances has discovered.”


Tessa Lena:

Hi there, and welcome to “Make Language Nice Once more.” At this time it’s my super honor to welcome Dr. Meryl Nass — who would not want a lot introduction — however simply to say a number of phrases, she is a outstanding doctor, and he or she’s an skilled on bioweapons, anthrax particularly. In 2001, Dr. Nass testified in Congress about anthrax, and he or she has had a stellar profession.

And for me personally, it could be an honor to interview Dr. Nass at any level, however the event is absolutely unusual. And I am frankly rubbing my eyes nonetheless that that is taking place. So what occurred to Dr. Nass lately is that her medical license was suspended by the medical board, and he or she was ordered to bear psychological analysis, like, Soviet model, as a result of she has been a great physician. Let’s simply take it from there.

Dr. Meryl Nass:

So … Effectively, I am a doctor in inside drugs. I have been practising drugs for 41 years, and I have been in Maine 24 years. And I mainly have two tracks. One monitor is that I care for sufferers who’ve power diseases which might be laborious to diagnose and laborious to deal with, like power Lyme illness, power fatigue syndrome, and different … Gulf Conflict Syndrome, different issues that different docs haven’t been capable of handle efficiently.

And I modified my observe in order that it primarily centered on treating COVID and giving individuals prescriptions for ivermectin, and nutritional vitamins and different issues, when COVID got here round.

As a result of I’ve a powerful background in organic warfare, and pandemics, and pandemic response, I began doing a whole lot of analysis at first of 2020 — and preserving a weblog, and telling individuals, attempting to elucidate the pandemic to them: clarify SARS-CoV-2, clarify SARS-CoV-1, attempt to put issues into perspective. I talked about masks, talked about assessments, you know the way to guard your self, easy methods to clear your greens, for instance. I talked about each facet of the pandemic on this weblog.

And in order issues advanced … and in addition what I did by likelihood was I learn articles, the Nature Medication article, an article in The Lancet, and different issues. And I got here to conclude very early again in the long run of March of 2020, that there was a cover-up occurring concerning the origin of COVID. And that it definitely got here from a lab there was no query about that.

So … in order that I’ve written about additionally over time, and I, in reality, am … I used to be the one one who mentioned concerning the Nature Medication article that I do not imagine the 5 authors truly wrote that article. It was an article that lacked scientific validity, it was clearly propaganda — and I mentioned, these guys wouldn’t have provide you with this by themselves.

Both another person wrote it, or they had been advised to write down it. And, in reality, once we obtained the Fauci emails early in 2021, we came upon that Fauci and Francis Collins and Jeremy Farrar, who’s the top of the Wellcome Belief within the UK, in reality, did direct them to write down this text … and assisted … Fauci edited it, and folks from the Wellcome Belief had been who … so Fauci was an a … he was a ghost author, and, and employees on the Wellcome Belief, had been additionally ghost writers on that paper.

So anyway, so I’ve form of been caught into many facets of this. After which when the vaccines got here out, I in fact, being additionally an skilled in vaccines, I took an in depth take a look at the vaccines — and as proof turned apparent that they weren’t working the best way they need to, and had been inflicting a whole lot of unwanted side effects, I made that very plain as effectively.

What occurred after that was that nationwide organizations which might be concerned with the licensing or the certification, a board specialty certification of docs began issuing recommendation to their members, that they need to not use “misinformation” or “disinformation” concerning therapies and vaccines for COVID and threatening them with lack of their specialty certification and even lack of their license.

And this began in mid 2021, and it was broad … it got here from the AMA, the American Medical Affiliation, the American Board of Inner Medication, Household Apply, and Pediatrics, and the Federation of State Medical Boards, which is a company that each one the licensing boards for all of the states and territories belong to.

So for some cause, all these organizations which might be allegedly nonprofit, however earn an excessive amount of cash, their CEOs, usually earn greater than one million {dollars} a yr … all these organizations on the similar time began threatening docs to not unfold “misinformation,” and mainly observe the federal government program on the analysis and therapy of COVID.

Effectively, I wrote to a number of of them and mentioned, you already know, you don’t have any authority to subject these threats. Guess what, now we have a First Modification. It is … it provides us freedom of speech. And I additionally challenged my very own licensing board and mentioned, you already know, what, who, who created a brand new crime of “misinformation”? I, you already know, I do not see that on the statute. The legislature did not vote on this, you already know, does the board of licensure and drugs get to invent new crimes?

So all these items occurred. And so I wasn’t stunned after they went after me. However I felt like this was such a basic subject, as a result of it is not solely taking place in Maine, it is taking place all through the nation. So this Federation of State Medical Boards has managed to exhort 15 completely different medical boards to truly go after, to problem the licenses of docs in 15 states.

Fortunately, the opposite 50 or so boards, 55 haven’t, they’ve just a little they really possibly learn the regulation. Perhaps they know there is a First Modification, they usually have not performed it, however 15 of the boards have began threatening and even eradicating the licenses of docs pressure free speech.

And as I mentioned, I imply, we’re going by means of a extremely apocalyptic time in historical past. And this can be a basic constitutional freedom of speech subject, I am out in direction of the top of my profession, I do not want the cash to observe. I am not supporting a household anymore.

And I felt that if anybody may take a danger to problem this, what I assumed was totalitarian, Soviet model strategy to controlling drugs, then I, you already know, can be … and I’ve a stellar file, I’ve by no means had a malpractice case, I’ve by no means had an adversarial board motion, you already know, my medical profession is so clear, I assumed they can not presumably go after me for my therapy of sufferers. And actually, they have not. So … in order that’s my story.

Tessa Lena:

Oh, that’s such a surprising scenario that you simply’re coping with, particularly the psychological analysis … like, as I am saying, that I am nonetheless rubbing my eyes, as a result of that’s straight again to the USSR, earlier than my days, truly. And so your response in your weblog to the complaints and to the suspension of your license is stellar, I feel. So if you wish to go over the factors?

Dr. Meryl Nass:

Okay. So, the Board … this is what occurred. So the Board mentioned, we obtained two complaints from residents. They aren’t your sufferers. They’ve by no means met you. However they noticed movies of you on-line, they usually complain that you simply had been spreading “misinformation.” Reply. Which was very Soviet in itself.

So I mentioned, Look, what is the “misinformation”? Be particular! And so they would not reply. So I mentioned, you anticipate me to defend myself towards something I’ve ever mentioned, on-line or outdoors the workplace? I mentioned, what proper do you must even examine my non-public life? In fact, they did not reply that, both.

So then they … one of many complaints was the interview that Dr. Mercola did with me. So that they obtained it transcribed, they usually simply put, you already know, they simply threw the transcript into my docket, as if I’ve to … now … I am anticipated to offer proof for each single assertion I made in an hour plus interview.

Effectively, you already know, once more, that does not sound very authorized. You understand, they have not truly accused me of a criminal offense. They have not mentioned one assertion is unsuitable, however I’ve to defend myself. So one other Soviet tactic.

That was the primary two complaints. The third one was … so what the Board of Medication and the Board of Pharmacy have performed in my state, and I believe has occurred in lots of different states, is as a result of they do not have the authority to cease the prescribing by docs and the shelling out by pharmacists of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, they’ve as an alternative despatched out letters, memos and different issues, indicating that these aren’t FDA authorized for goal, and implying that docs and pharmacists who do present these to sufferers could possibly be investigated, may have their licenses eliminated.

And so they did not say that in so many phrases. They implied it in a number of warnings. And so what occurred is sort of each pharmacist within the state of Maine will not dispense these drugs, though they’re authorized, that they’ve licenses, they’re for people. I can write prescriptions. And the governor of the state even made an order in 2020 that hydroxychloroquine can’t be used for prophylaxis however can be utilized for the therapy of acute COVID.

So I had a affected person about six weeks in the past, who was a really excessive danger affected person. I used to be very scared of what would possibly occur to him if he obtained COVID. And I had prescribed ivermectin beforehand, which was authorized, however not hydroxychloroquine as a result of it wasn’t authorized in my state. And when he obtained COVID, I then mentioned, effectively, we higher provide the hydroxychloroquine now, and I knew there have been no pharmacies in his space that had been keen to dispense it.

So I known as it in any means. And I did not state the rationale which you … they need you to remain in order that they’ll determine whether or not or to not dispense it. And the pharmacist, I left a message and the pharmacist known as me again and mentioned what’s it is for. And so I may both say COVID, and the affected person would not obtain the medicine. Or I may say one thing else. So I mentioned one thing else.

I mentioned Lyme illness, and the pharmacist distributed the medicine, the affected person took it, he finally wound up within the hospital on a ventilator anyway. That is how excessive danger he was. He survived. He is a lot better now. However that is what occurred.

And I instantly knowledgeable the board and I mentioned, Look, your insurance policies and the insurance policies of the pharmacy board have compelled me to misinform a pharmacist so as to get a affected person a sorely wanted medicine. And you have to change your insurance policies. This isn’t acceptable.

So … so the third criticism was that I lied to a pharmacist. Now I had advised them 5 minutes after I did it that I had lied to a pharmacist, they’d compelled me to misinform a pharmacist as a result of it was completely authorized to do what I had performed to prescribe this drug and have it distributed. However solely due to these whispers and veiled threats we could not get it for the affected person, and I needed to lie.

In order that was criticism three. There have been two extra complaints from well being care professionals. Each of … one mentioned, this physician prescribed hydroxychloroquine to a affected person she was pregnant. And I ought to have I ought to have been known as. And I’d have given the affected person monoclonal antibodies.

The second physician mentioned, this physician prescribed ivermectin to a affected person and the affected person did not recuperate and wound up within the hospital. And this might have delayed care, correct care. So these had been the complaints, not one from a affected person or a affected person’s household. Not one, not a single certainly one of these 5 complaints actually alleging that I had harmed a affected person.

However that was sufficient for them to begin a witch hunt, a fishing expedition. And so, by … so then they mentioned, Effectively, you are instantly a hazard to your sufferers. So we summarily droop your license, and we direct you to a neuro psychological examination.

Now, they’d nothing, actually they’d nothing on me, simply these, you already know, issues that aren’t actually crimes. So it is not a criminal offense to prescribe a licensed drug. And while you’re a licensed physician, and it was off label, effectively guess what, 20 to 40% of all medicine are prescribed off label. It is nothing unsuitable with that. So …

What they actually needed to do was to damage my life as a lot as attainable. By ordering the psychological examination, they then had been capable of put these information within the public area and smear me. So the nationwide information then reported on me, implying that I had a substance abuse downside, and that is why I wanted a neuropsych examination. And I’ve by no means been a substance abuser.

 The opposite factor the board did … so, when you’re reported to the Nationwide Practitioner Knowledge Financial institution, mainly you possibly can’t get a license in one other state, and you may’t get a job. In order that’s additionally … by ordering the psych examination, that sends me into the Nationwide Practitioner Knowledge Financial institution.

The opposite factor they did was mentioned we wish … as a result of they wanted a affected person … they wanted to seek out one thing I’ve performed unsuitable, they usually nonetheless did not have something … they mentioned, we wish a listing of each affected person you have seen within the final six months. So … and I’ve had two attorneys who’re assigned to me by my malpractice insurer, and each of them, after they obtained into this case, they stop. So for the time being, I do not also have a lawyer. The attorneys do not need to deal with it. Yeah, so that is the scenario.

Tessa Lena:

Nevertheless it’s beautiful. The quantity of ignorance … as a result of though I’m not a health care provider … my closest relationship to drugs is I grew up with docs, and I helped my mother translate her thesis once I was a child. However even I knew, earlier than studying your weblog, that hydroxychloroquine was protected in being pregnant. I imply, I knew that being a layman, and they didn’t know that?

Dr. Meryl Nass:

The midwife apparently didn’t know that. She additionally did not know that the monoclonal antibodies she needed to present the affected person aren’t authorized or licensed in being pregnant, and the chance is totally unknown.

You understand … however that is … individuals have drunk the Kool Help, they do not notice that they can not any longer belief the recommendation from federal companies, you already know, and particularly somebody like a midwife who’s a nurse, a nurse practitioner, mainly, they’re … their entire profession has been taking orders from the medical institution and from docs.

They do not notice they’ve the power to truly look issues up, they usually do not have to simply do what they’re advised.

So … with the digital medical file, now, in case you kind in “COVID,” you already know, the digital medical file will come up and spit out what you are supposed to present the affected person and it’ll say Remdesivir, or it will say monoclonal antibodies, or, you already know, one other experimental antiviral … it would not say, hydroxychloroquine, or ivermectin — and docs who’re utilizing these digital medical information do not even, you already know, notice that there are different choices on the market.

Tessa Lena:

However your file of treating sufferers has been extraordinarily profitable. And, as you mentioned, none of your sufferers complained, none of their members of the family complained.

Dr. Meryl Nass:


Tessa Lena:

That’s simply beautiful. And you already know, what I used to be considering as I used to be getting ready for this interview, in all probability the identical people who find themselves complaining, or at the least their increased ups, in the event that they had been in a vital situation, they’d in all probability select you as a health care provider. And never Dr. Fauci.

Dr. Meryl Nass:

Sure. As a result of …

Tessa Lena:

Yeah. Sorry, go forward.

Dr. Meryl Nass:

That is true. I do know Peter McCullough has mentioned he has handled, you already know, many legislators, for instance. And I met a lawyer who then turned an Lawyer Normal in one of many states. And he and his spouse advised me that they needed to smuggle ivermectin into their son … within the hospital, with COVID, as a result of the docs would not give it. So, I imply, it is a tremendous story.

This this one who’s now an Lawyer Normal, not in New England, needed to smuggle ivermectin in for his son, to maintain him alive.

So sure, lots of the officers do know that these medicine are efficient and need them for themselves, and get them for themselves. However they go together with the narrative. They do not problem it. And, you already know, their profession is extra essential.

And I felt that, you already know, fact and the First Modification, and altering drugs … drugs ought to … drugs is meant to be a few relationship between a health care provider and a affected person and serving to a person affected person get the perfect care they want, not imposing authorities diktats on sufferers, not … not bringing in a brand new regular through … sorry … a brand new regular through enforced medical care and enforced medical lockdowns, masks, and many others.

The I feel the entire medical career the medical institution has been used to make profound adjustments in our society, you already know, beneath the guise of coping with a pandemic. And so, you already know, I really feel like I’ve to face up for that. That is far more essential than preserving my profession.

Tessa Lena:

I love you, and the scenario in drugs … Effectively, a number of issues to say right here. One, it jogs my memory of the early Nazi Germany the place as we all know, the docs and the nurses had been on the forefront of the psychological change, the place the nurses would, you already know, hug a child with a incapacity, after which inject them with a deadly injection and kill them.

And so they knew they had been doing that, they usually did it form of from love. And it took seemingly not that a lot to persuade them that that was an act of goodness, to kill that child with incapacity. And that claims quite a bit.

And … and docs, from what I hear, in Nazi Germany had been very, very extremely represented within the Nazi Celebration.

Dr. Meryl Nass:


Tessa Lena:

They had been becoming a member of in excessive numbers and different professions. And these had been educated individuals who effectively, presumably, joined the career so as to assist individuals. So, what could be performed to human head with ideology is simply horrifying and beautiful. And simply …

Dr. Meryl Nass:

Tessa, there’s a … there’s a very disturbing film … there have been rumors about euthanasia within the UK, throughout the pandemic. And there is a disturbing film known as “A very good loss of life” that has simply been launched, about the truth that docs and nurses in hospitals within the UK have been injecting sufferers with COVID, with a mixture of midazolam, which is like Valium, however stronger, and morphine, and typically different medicine, to present them additionally a great loss of life, as fast and simple loss of life.

And it is very disturbing, there are paperwork displaying that the UK purchased a few years value of midazolam, this drug, like Valium, that’s used for euthanasia, and … at first of the pandemic, and went by means of this two years stockpile in a few months, two or three months, after which wound up shopping for some extra.

I am unable to vouch for the entire veracity of this, however it’s excessive … there are various households interviewed … It’s totally disturbing. And one can see that beneath … once more, within the UK, within the US beneath the guise of defending the Nationwide Well being Service or defending our hospitals, you already know, individuals needed to postpone their surgical procedures needed to do numerous issues, so they would not disturb the hospital so they may care for COVID sufferers.

And in case you’re in a hospital, and also you run out of beds, it could make sense that you must kill off the older COVID sufferers. So you might have room for the youthful ones, or one thing like that. These are, you already know, the clearly towards the regulation, very troubling.

One of many ways in which this may be ushered in is that if medicine or if medicine or ventilators are used which might be emergency use licensed, all legal responsibility is taken away from the docs, nurses and others who’re making use of those merchandise. So in case you give a affected person, for instance, Remdesivir was licensed, now it is authorized, or monoclonal antibodies, and the affected person dies, you possibly can’t be sued. If the affected person’s injured, you possibly can’t be sued, the producer cannot be sued, the hospital cannot be sued.

Everyone has had their legal responsibility waived so long as you are utilizing certainly one of these experimental merchandise. And while you go into the hospital with COVID, these experimental merchandise are what the physician has been advised to make use of. So this can be a authorized mechanism that permits very dangerous issues to occur in a means the place no person is afraid they are going to be punished afterwards.

Tessa Lena:

That could be a scary thought. And I’ve additionally heard about it, I have never seen the documentary, so thanks for mentioning, I’ll undoubtedly watch it. However it’s beautiful to consider the slide in direction of evil.

Like, it doesn’t have to begin with an individual needing to do evil, it might probably begin in a wholly completely different place. After which, by peer strain, and simply seeing evil taking place and step by step normalizing it in personal head, any individual who began with the best intentions, can grow to be a messenger of evil with out even realizing that, after which it is too late. And it is actually, actually beautiful to consider it.

Like I do know, for instance, that after the autumn of the Soviet Union, what was taking place within the hospitals there, I do not learn about euthanasia or something like that, however I do know for a indisputable fact that they’d typically tie a affected person to a mattress or not enable relations to return in, after which the individual would possibly die, and issues like that which might be simply unthinkable cruelty.

And that is one thing I have been fascinated with for years simply due to my household historical past over there, and It surprised me again then. And it looks as if now, it’s virtually the norm in hospitals. I do not need to say “the norm,” it is too scary, it is too darkish … possibly not. However at the least far more of a norm. And …

Dr. Meryl Nass:

It truly is the norm. Most hospitals won’t let household in anymore. What somebody advised me, I do not know if that is true, both. They mentioned the household was solely led in as soon as they’d agreed mainly to let the affected person go. As soon as they agreed to disconnect them from a ventilator, then the household was allowed in to say their goodbyes … Sorry …

Tessa Lena:

I do not know … I’m like, what is going on to individuals’s heads? As a result of the idea of medical homicide, I feel, is one thing that’s so laborious for a lot of common residents, and I imply,” common” as in, similar to regular individuals … so laborious to simply accept.

As a result of if you concentrate on, say, an American, a daily American who had a considerably profitable profession, or very profitable profession, they made cash, they’d their prime time, they went to events, they’d relationships, they, I do not know, gave interviews … they did all these issues which might be superb and nice.

After which rapidly, they’re outdated. And so they’re locked within the hospital room. And rapidly, they see the face of the machine, and that is it. And their households aren’t allowed in, they usually’re being murdered. And possibly they even notice at that time, in these previous couple of days, that they are being murdered, or possibly not, however that that’s it. And no person sees that. Speaking about it’s suspicious, it makes you sound loopy as a result of it simply “cannot be taking place.” And that may be a horrifying thought.

And so many individuals had even their members of the family who died from COVID within the hospital. After which that was used to frighten all people else, and to justify all of the draconian measures, and …

Dr. Meryl Nass:

Or the households who begged the hospital to present their member of the family ivermectin, they usually will not. After which … after which they’ve to herald a lawyer and sue the hospital. And the hospitals are paying attorneys to battle again to not give sufferers a drug that could possibly be life-saving. Who’s who’s paying the hospital, to spend cash to attempt to stop sufferers from getting a superbly protected drug that may be life-saving?

I imply, we’re in a really, very darkish scenario. As I mentioned, the medical trade is getting used to herald the brand new regular, and the brand new regular just isn’t wanting very good.

And folks do not actually know what is going on on, even I do not know, I am not working in a hospital any longer, so I do not know what’s taking place. However I do have individuals name me, begging me to assist, you already know, get their relative drugs. However when you’re within the hospital, I am unable to assist.

I can assist as a … I may have helped as an outpatient … I can not now do something. However earlier than, you possibly can deal with sufferers so long as there are outpatients … as soon as they enter the hospital. You haven’t any … no say over them. It is the docs who’re assigned to them there.

Tessa Lena:

It’s scary. I do know one good story the place a pal’s relative in her 90s was within the hospital for one more cause … she developed pneumonia, then she was recognized with COVID. And no person is aware of whether or not COVID was the rationale or what however she ended up surviving, they usually handled her as a human being, as in … I do not assume they had been giving her COVID drugs per se, however that in all probability wasn’t even the rationale, in order that they handled her with care.

And so they handled her pneumonia correctly, and he or she survived, and he or she was out, and he or she’s tremendous. So that’s one story as a result of I used to be terrified when she was within the hospital. However there are such a lot of tales which might be the other of that, sadly. So the hospital …

Dr. Meryl Nass:

You understand, one other factor that occurred early on, and I … I wrote extensively about this imply, I in all probability wrote the seminal article, was that there have been a number of scientific trials, which gave sufferers extreme doses of hydroxychloroquine that had been doubtlessly deadly.

And certainly one of these trials was performed all through the UK and enrolled 1600 individuals within the arm of the trial that gave a dose of hydroxychloroquine that was a number of instances increased than regular. It is … that these has by no means been used therapeutically earlier than for something. There was no justification for it. And 25% of the sufferers in that trial died.

They … WHO had a trial, they usually enrolled about 1000 sufferers, they usually overdose hydroxychloroquine arm, and a bit over 100 sufferers died.

These trials continued even after a Brazilian trial had overdosed individuals on the cousin of hydroxychloroquine, which is Chloroquine … had proven that they’d an unlimited variety of deaths, 40% in in a small trial of overdosed Chloroquine, they usually, the Brazilians advised the world about it, they instantly reported it, it was printed within the Jama in April of final yr, as quickly because it occurred — and but the UK trial, and the WHO trial continued and continued till June, and the WHO trial solely stopped three days after I had written to Tedros and others on the WHO and advised them, When you have not disclosed to your topics that you simply’re giving them a doubtlessly deadly dose of this drug, you’ll be liable. After which the trial stopped.

However the truth that, you already know, many docs in numerous international locations had been concerned with these trials, and none of them apparently bothered to search for the dose and discover out that they had been giving a borderline deadly dose to sufferers … when you concentrate on it … consider …

I imply, over 2600 individuals in these massive scientific trials in a number of international locations had been overdosed with hydroxychloroquine, apparently, for the aim of creating the … giving the drug such a nasty identify, that no person would use it. And that is April, Could 2020.

Tessa Lena:

I keep in mind while you simply wrote about it, I used to be surprised. And the truth that the medicine that’s so outdated, and, I do not know, individuals on the WHO did not know the proper dosage? With the docs, they in all probability simply complied, though it could have helped to learn concerning the dosage, however … beautiful.

Dr. Meryl Nass:

So … you possibly can’t … you possibly can’t make a mistake, I do not assume you may make a mistake like this when the WHO had committees designed to determine what these to make use of, proper? And the Invoice and Melinda Gates Basis had individuals on all of the committees of the WHO, figuring out what medicine and doses needs to be used to … within the trials for COVID, early on, beginning in March, two years in the past.

And Invoice and Melinda Gates Basis has a gaggle of scientists who work on malaria medicine, Chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine are malaria medicine. So this group truly fashions dosing for malaria medicine, and members of this group had been within the group at WHO decided the doses. So I do not assume this was a mistake.

Tessa Lena:

It’s so darkish. As a result of then, there is no such thing as a different rationalization than homicide. And it’s so darkish. And even when the proof factors at that … it’s like, even for me, and I write about these issues, I analysis these issues, it is rather laborious to simply accept. One thing in me needs to seek out one other rationalization, there must be one other rationalization … it is simply too darkish!

Dr. Meryl Nass:

I do not assume there have been too many individuals who truly knew, I feel. I feel most individuals in, you already know, Western Europe, Within the UK, they do not cope with malaria, proper. I’ve had malaria. I’ve familiarity with these medicine. I spent six months in Africa, six months in India. So I do know all of the malaria medicine, however most docs do not.

I feel a number of individuals got here up with the dosing, for no matter cause, and all people else merely went alongside, they had been all busy, it was the start of the COVID pandemic, proper? Everyone was scratching their heads, attempting to determine what to do, did not have PPE, all people was frightened out of their wits, the docs and the nurses had been carrying rubbish baggage as an alternative of PPE. And all people did what they had been advised.

And these trials had been arrange, definitely the WHO trial was arrange, such that the, the docs and nurses didn’t choose the doses, you simply typed in just a little little bit of demographic info on the affected person, after which WHO would say which drug for use, and the dose, so it form of took these choices out of the fingers of the native docs.

There additionally was … was not formal, knowledgeable consent in that WHO trial. They claimed that they … a few of the consent was obtained afterwards, and that they’d given the knowledgeable consent kinds to the affected person. Effectively, in fact, you do not do this. You may should hold them for the trial. It is a authorized doc.

They are saying they gave them to the affected person, so … they didn’t get knowledgeable consent from … for the sufferers within the WHO scientific trial. I do not know … it is a very troublesome time. There are a number of dangerous individuals and lots of people who do not know any higher. They in all probability do not know what the legal guidelines are. They do not know how the system works they usually’re, you already know, placing one foot in entrance of the opposite.

It’s totally laborious to be a health care provider right this moment. You do not have very a lot autonomy, you do not have a lot authority, all people’s wanting over your shoulder. And so they’re, I feel most of them are simply attempting to maintain their nostril clear and simply carry on marching till they’ll retire.

Tessa Lena:

That’s so unhappy. And now, switching in direction of philosophy for a second, I keep in mind the time previous to the pandemic, a number of years earlier than the pandemic, when there have been so many warnings, saying that if algorithmic considering and algorithmic know-how takes over drugs or aviation, it is not going to be fairly, as a result of finally docs are going to be slaves to the algorithm, and they’ll be afraid for his or her licenses, as a result of they’ll be sued in the event that they step just a little bit away from the algorithm, and they’ll be trapped, and not likely practising drugs anymore. However a number of years in the past, it was simply philosophy, form of, a dialog over a glass of wine.

Dr. Meryl Nass:

Proper. Precisely. Theoretical,

Tessa Lena:

Theoretical. And … and I had these conversations, and I even led a few of these conversations — and I couldn’t think about in my wildest goals that this may be taking place in 2020 and on. It’s actually scary.

Dr. Meryl Nass:

Effectively, so … so you possibly can see. I imply, from my perspective, when all these items are taking place, it is smart that you must arise and say no, you already know, I am unable to be a silent German. Regardless of the danger, you already know … you must say sufficient is sufficient.

Tessa Lena:

Good for you! And I truly suspect that when the darkness passes, which it is going to, though we do not know when, however these docs who’re compliant, lots of them may be thrown beneath the bus. As a result of that is the way it often works in historical past.

Dr. Meryl Nass:

Yeah … I imply, I … I am not so positive that is what occurs in historical past. I feel the … the obedient individuals proceed to be obedient and often get by, however I, I’ve nothing … you already know, I feel all people is doing their greatest.

I feel there’s only a few individuals who have the background I’ve, who’ve … you already know, I’ve consulted for the Director of Nationwide Intelligence right here in america. And I’ve consulted for the Ministry of Well being in Cuba. You understand, as I mentioned, I’ve traveled to many international locations. I’ve seen how issues work. And I, you already know, so I’ve a broader perspective.

I do know … I do know, the regulation as a result of I used to be very a lot concerned with the authorized work across the anthrax vaccine for years. So I realized what the regulation was concerning medicine and vaccines, and virtually no docs have that form of background.

So when … when a board tells them they can not, you already know, unfold “misinformation,” they assume the board has the authority to say that, they usually assume they higher not unfold “misinformation.” And so they, you already know, attempt … attempt to do the best factor, so …

I haven’t got … I am, I am not likely offended at anybody, I feel this can be a mixture of a whole lot of ignorance, and some dangerous actors. And I do hope the dangerous actors might be, you already know, taken to process. However I feel for the remaining, we have to begin educating individuals the Structure, the regulation, you already know, your … your nation has assured you rights, and you could not give them up.

You understand, lots of people fought and died for these rights, and you may’t stroll away from them. And freedom of speech is the First Modification as is freedom of faith. The states aren’t allowed to take these rights away from you, that is the 14th modification.

So, hopefully, individuals will study, they’re going to study what their rights are, they study what the best factor is, they usually’ll study that there is one thing sacred concerning the physician affected person relationship. It is not the physician affected person authorities relationship, or the physician affected person pharma relationship. It is the physician affected person relationship. And except the affected person is the one factor the physician cares about, that belief is damaged, and the entire edifice of drugs will collapse.

Tessa Lena:

Effectively, thanks for being so fantastic and brave. I actually admire you as a human being and your work and your stance. It’s actually, actually admirable. And I hope that much more individuals will observe in your footsteps, and cease complying in the event that they’re compliant right this moment, it is rather essential.

Dr. Meryl Nass:

Thanks, Tessa. Thanks. Good to fulfill you.

Tessa Lena:

Good to fulfill you, too. So, is there something that you simply need to add earlier than we wrap up, and in addition the place can individuals discover you? I am positive individuals know, however simply the point out it right here.

Dr. Meryl Nass:

So I’ve two blogs. The one I replace most steadily is anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com. My different weblog is merylnassmd.com. And if I’ve time, I’ll make a Substack. Thanks.

Tessa Lena:

Oh thanks. And good luck! I hope you win very very quickly and gloriously.

Dr. Meryl Nass:

I admire it, thanks, bye-bye.

Tessa Lena:


Concerning the Writer

To search out extra of Tessa Lena’s work, remember to try her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Electronic Vault
Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)