Yesterday, October 8, 2021, I revealed a Highwire unique interview with Deborah Conrad, a doctor’s assistant who’s blowing the whistle on COVID jab accidents, and the truth that these accidents are hardly ever reported due to a defective VAERS database design.
Immediately you’re in for yet one more bombshell video: “Vaccine Secrets and techniques: COVID Disaster.” It’s the primary episode of “The False Narrative Takedown Sequence,” produced by Steve Kirsch, government director of the COVID-19 Early Therapy Fund.
“Vaccine Secrets and techniques” enhances and helps all the pieces Conrad shared in her interview, so I extremely suggest saving these recordsdata in your pc and watching each of them. Each can be found on Bitchute.
How Many Have Died From the COVID Jabs?
In line with Kirsch, the COVID pictures have already killed an estimated 200,000 People, a far larger quantity than the 15,386 deaths reported to the U.S. Vaccine Opposed Occasion Reporting System (VAERS) as of September 17, 2021.1 You’ll find all of the analysis for Episode 1 of the “False Narrative Takedown” sequence on SKirsch.io/vaccine-resources.2
As famous by Kirsch, Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky claims no causative hyperlink has been discovered for any of those deaths. She’s not mendacity, per se. However she’s additionally not telling the entire reality.
Up to now, the CDC has not decided that any dying was instantly brought on by the COVID shot, however that doesn’t imply the injections haven’t killed anybody. On this episode, Kirsch units out to find out whether or not proof of causality exists, and if that’s the case, what the precise dying toll is more likely to be.
Can VAERS Knowledge Reveal Causality?
The large disconnect, Kirsch factors out, is that the CDC insists that VAERS, as an early warning system, can’t show (or disprove) causality. Kirsch argues that that is false. The concept VAERS can’t present causality is a part of how and why the CDC can declare not one of the deaths is attributable to the COVID shot.
To show his level, Kirsch provides the next analogy: Suppose you give a two-dose vaccine. After the primary dose, nothing occurs, however after the second dose, individuals die inside 24 hours of a deep vein thrombosis (DVT). While you have a look at the VAERS information, what you’ll discover is not any stories related to the primary dose, and a rash of deaths after the second dose, and all inside the similar timeframe and with the identical reason for dying.
In line with the CDC, you can’t ascribe any causality in any respect from that. To them, it’s simply random likelihood that everybody died after the second dose, and from the identical situation, and never the primary dose or from one other situation.
Kirsch argues that causality CAN be recognized from this sort of information. It’s very troublesome to give you one other rationalization for why individuals die precisely 24 hours after their second dose.
For instance, is it cheap to imagine that folks with, say, undiagnosed coronary heart situations would die precisely 24 hours after getting a second dose of vaccine? Or that folks with undiagnosed diabetes would die precisely 24 hours after their second dose?
Why not after the primary dose, or two months after the second dose, or another random variety of hours or days, or for different random reason for dying? Why would individuals randomly die of the identical situation at the very same time, over and over?
Vaccine Program Wants To Be Halted Instantly
In line with Kirsch, the vaccination program ought to be instantly halted, because the VAERS information counsel greater than 200,000 People have already died, and greater than 2 million have been critically injured by the vaccines. Curiously sufficient, Kirsch and his total household took the COVID shot early on, so he’s not coming from an “anti-vax” place.
Ending the vaccinations wouldn’t spell catastrophe by way of permitting COVID-19 to run rampant, as we now know there are protected and efficient early therapy protocols that everybody can use, each at dwelling and within the hospital. These remedies additionally work for all variants.
In line with Kirsch, the CDC, the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and the Nationwide Institutes of Well being are all “spreading misinformation concerning the vaccine versus early therapy.” In a nutshell, these businesses are saying the exact opposite of what’s true — basic Orwellian doublespeak.
They declare the COVID pictures are protected and efficient, when the info present they’re neither, and so they say there isn’t a protected and efficient early therapy, which is clearly false. On the similar time, our medical freedoms are being stripped away underneath the guise of public well being — all whereas an immense dying toll is allowed to happen proper earlier than our eyes.
Kirsch is so assured in his analyses, he’s provided a $1 million educational grant to anybody who can present his evaluation is flawed by an element of 4 or extra. Up to now, nobody has stepped as much as declare the prize. He’s even provided $1 million to any official keen to easily have a public debate with him concerning the information, and none has accepted the problem.
As famous by Kirsch, “we’ve changed debates as a technique to settle scientific disagreements … with government-driven censorship and intimidation.” Medical suggestions at the moment are additionally pushed by the White Home quite than medical consultants and medical doctors themselves.
False Narratives Overview
On this episode, Kirsch goes by way of 5 false narratives about COVID jab security, particularly that:
- The pictures are protected and efficient
- Nobody has died from the COVID shot
- You can’t use VAERS to find out causality
- The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is innocent
- Just a few opposed occasions are related to the pictures and so they’re all “gentle”
He additionally evaluations the 5 false narratives about what the options are:
- Vaccines are the one technique to finish the pandemic
- Vaccine mandates are due to this fact wanted
- Masks work
- Early remedies don’t work
- Ivermectin is harmful
COVID Shot Kills 5 Instances Extra Individuals Than It Saves
Kirsch cites info from Dr. Peter Schirmacher, chief pathologist on the College of Heidelberg, who’s acknowledged as one of many prime 100 pathologists on the planet.
Schirmacher did autopsies on 40 sufferers who died inside two weeks of their COVID jab, and located 30% to 40% of them have been conclusively as a result of shot, as there was no different underlying pathology that might have brought on the deaths. Now, he didn’t rule out that 100% of the deaths might have been brought on by the pictures. He simply couldn’t conclusively show it.
There’s additionally Pfizer’s six-month research, which included 44,000 individuals. Through the blinded interval of the research, the deaths have been nearly even — 15 deaths within the vaccine group and 14 within the management group. So, one life was saved by the shot.
However then, after the research was unblinded and controls have been provided the vaccine, one other three within the unique vaccine group died together with two unique placebo recipients who opted to get the shot. None of those deaths was thought of associated to the Pfizer “vaccine,” but nobody is aware of what they really died from.
So, the ultimate tally ended up being 20 deaths within the vaccine group and 14 deaths within the management group. What this tells us is the Pfizer shot provides no all-cause mortality profit. The shot saved one life, and killed six, which provides us a net-negative mortality charge. The truth is that 5 occasions extra persons are killed by the shot than are saved by it.
The best way to Calculate Extra Mortality
Within the video, Kirsch explains how anybody can calculate the variety of COVID shot deaths utilizing VAERS information. What we’re right here is extra deaths, not background deaths of people that have been going to die from a pure trigger, akin to outdated age, anyway. In abstract, that is carried out by:
- Figuring out the propensity to report
- Figuring out the variety of home deaths within the VAERS database
- Figuring out the underreporting issue for severe occasions
- Figuring out the background dying charge, i.e., all deaths reported to VAERS by yr
- Calculating the variety of extra deaths
Lastly, you’ll validate your findings utilizing unbiased strategies or evaluating it to what others have discovered. Step-by-step directions and calculations may be discovered within the doc referred to as “Estimating the Variety of Vaccine Deaths in America.”3
Extra Than 200,000 Have Probably Been Killed by the Jabs
Between the documentation on his web site and the video, you get an in depth in-depth understanding of how to do that and the way Kirsch got here to the conclusions made. Right here, I’ll merely present a abstract rundown of Kirsch calculations and conclusions:
- Propensity to report = similar as in earlier years
- Variety of home deaths within the VAERS database = 6,167 as of August 27, 2021
- Below-reporting issue for severe occasions = 41 (i.e., for each 41 occasions, just one is reported)
- Background VAERS dying charge = 500 per yr (this background dying quantity can be subtracted twice, as most COVID jab recipients are receiving two doses. This provides us a really conservative estimate)
- Extra deaths calculation = (6,167 – 2 x 500) x 41 = 212,000 extra deaths
Utilizing the identical calculation strategies, Kirsch conservatively estimates greater than 300,000 People have additionally been completely disabled by the COVID pictures. These estimates have been validated by 4 groups of researchers utilizing different strategies. (None of them used VAERS information.)
Kirsch additionally demonstrates one other calculation to point out the COVID pictures kill extra individuals than the precise COVID-19 an infection does. That calculation additionally exhibits that when you’re underneath the age of fifty, your threat of dying from the vaccine is bigger than your likelihood of dying from COVID-19, so it is mindless from a risk-benefit perspective to get the jab when you’re youthful than 50.
What’s extra, since your threat of pure an infection exponentially decreases over time (as pure herd immunity grows, your likelihood of an infection roughly halves every year), the dangers of the COVID shot quickly outgrow any potential profit with every passing yr.
Examples of Opposed Occasions
Kirsch has additionally analyzed opposed occasions by symptom, calculating the speed at which they happen after the COVID pictures in comparison with the typical charge seen for all different vaccines mixed from 2015- to 2019 for ages 20 to 60. Right here’s a sampling:4
Pulmonary embolism, happens at a charge 473 occasions larger than the conventional incidence charge (i.e., if there was one pulmonary embolism occasion reported in VAERS on common for all vaccines, there have been 473 occasions following a COVID injection)
Stroke, 326 occasions larger
Deep vein thrombosis 264.3 occasions larger
Appendicitis 145.5 occasions larger
Parkinson’s illness 55 occasions larger
Blindness 29.1 occasions larger
Deafness 44.7 occasions larger
Dying 58.1 occasions larger
Curiously, the most typical reason for dying in kids aged 12 to 17 who bought the COVID shot was pulmonary embolism. This was decided by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) after analyzing the deaths of 14 kids. Coincidence? Or proof of causality?
Anecdotes and Different Knowledge Constant With Excessive Dying Charge
Kirsch additionally cites anecdotal information that may clue us into what’s taking place. One prime neurologist claims to have 2,000 reportable vaccine accidents in 2021, in comparison with zero within the final 11 years.
In all, 5% of her current sufferers now have suspected vaccine accidents. But this neurologist has solely reported two of them, as a result of she bought so pissed off with the VAERS system. So, on this occasion, the under-reporting charge is just not 41, however 1,000. And she or he’s not alone. That is one other basic real-world illustration of what the PA Deborah Conrad shared in yesterday’s article.
Canadian doctor Dr. Charles Hoffe has additionally reported that 60% of his COVID jabbed sufferers have elevated D-dimer ranges, which is indicative of blood clotting, and ranges in lots of instances remained elevated for as much as three months.
This too is proof of causation, as a result of your D-dimer degree is a marker for blood clotting. Even when you don’t have apparent signs of clotting, it may possibly point out the presence of microclots. Hoffe discusses this within the video under.
Dr. Peter McCullough has additionally reported that troponin ranges are elevated in lots of vaccinated sufferers. Troponin is a marker for coronary heart injury, akin to if you’re having a coronary heart assault or myocarditis (coronary heart irritation). A degree between 1 and 4 is indicative of an acute or latest coronary heart assault. In case of a severe coronary heart assault, troponin can stay elevated for 5 days.
In lots of sufferers who’ve acquired the COVID jab, the troponin degree is between 35 and 50(!) and stays at that degree for as much as two months, which suggests large injury is happening to the guts. But that is what they’re routinely labeling as “gentle” myocarditis. There’s completely nothing gentle about this degree of coronary heart injury.
No Charge of Damage or Dying Is Too Nice
Unbelievably, there appears to be no ceiling above which the dying and incapacity toll is deemed too nice. Why aren’t the FDA and CDC involved about security when greater than half 1,000,000 facet impact stories have been filed? How come almost 15,000 reported deaths5 haven’t set off emergency alarms and in-depth investigations? Traditionally, 50 deaths have been the cutoff level at which a vaccine is pulled.
Contemplating the unprecedented dangers of those pictures, I urge you to assessment as a lot information as you’ll be able to earlier than you leap on the booster bandwagon. Primarily based on all the pieces I’ve seen, I consider the chance of unwanted side effects is probably going going to exponentially improve with every dose.
If you happen to want a refresher on the potential mechanisms of hurt, obtain and skim Stephanie Seneff’s glorious paper,6 “Worse Than The Illness: Reviewing Some Potential Unintended Penalties of mRNA Vaccines In opposition to COVID-19,” revealed within the Worldwide Journal of Vaccine Principle, Follow and Analysis in collaboration with Dr. Greg Nigh.