Pandemic Narrative Undergoes Radical U-Flip

As famous by Dr. Ron Paul within the January 10, 2022, Liberty Report above, U.S. authorities have out of the blue began to vary their tune with regard to COVID and the COVID pictures.

“The opposition to our place are beginning to get up,” Paul says, as some shreds of reality are literally beginning to be acknowledged. The excellent news, Paul says, is that “Possibly a few of the issues they’ve been saying usually are not fairly correct, and perhaps what we’ve been saying is nearer to the reality, and perhaps they’re beginning to acknowledge that.”

CDC Director Now Requires Targeted Safety

Certainly, in latest days, the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention has made a exceptional variety of U-turns, utterly reversing course on a number of narrative factors.

For instance, in a January 10, 2022, CNN interview, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky truly admitted that “what [the COVID shots] can’t do anymore is stop transmission,”1 whereas earlier than, the narrative was that for those who get the jab, you don’t have anything to fret about anymore. In July 2021, President Biden promised that for those who get vaccinated, “you’re not going to get COVID.”2 Nicely, it wasn’t true. Many knew that, however had been censored when pointing it out.

A day earlier, January 9, Walensky additionally despatched out a tweet saying “We should shield individuals with comorbidities from extreme COVID-19,” which is what tens of 1000’s of medical doctors have been calling for for the reason that creation of The Nice Barrington Declaration in early October 2020. It known as for centered safety of high-risk people, such because the aged, slightly than blanket lockdowns.

It was not too long ago revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the Nationwide Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Illnesses (NIAID) and his former boss, now retired Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH) director Francis Collins, colluded behind the scenes to quash the declaration.3 For no matter motive, Fauci and Collins had been hell-bent on pushing economy-destroying lockdowns as a substitute. In an October 8, 2020, e mail to Fauci, Collins wrote:4,5,6,7

“The proposal from the three fringe epidemiologists who met with the Secretary appears to be getting a variety of consideration … There must be a fast and devastating printed take down of its premises …”

“Don’t fear, I acquired this,” Fauci replied. Later, Fauci despatched Collins hyperlinks to newly printed articles refuting the centered safety answer, together with an op-ed in Wired journal, and an article in The Nation, titled “Targeted Safety, Herd Immunity and Different Lethal Delusions.”

CDC Follows Political Technique, Not Science

Now, swiftly, Walensky is onboard with the “lethal delusion” of centered safety. Her about-face could be complicated had been it not for the truth that COVID countermeasures had been by no means about defending the general public from a virus. From the beginning, the pandemic had political targets, and it nonetheless does.

The strain is now on to show the Biden administration has made some form of progress with the pandemic. Biden made a variety of guarantees, none of which have come to fruition, so now the political institution is scrounging to give you some plan that may make them look as if they’re getting someplace.

The issue is that circumstances are actually exploding, when a profitable vaccine marketing campaign ought to have introduced the state of affairs beneath management. So, they now want a approach to decrease the variety of circumstances, whereas earlier than, they used each trick within the e book to overcount them,8 to be able to scare individuals into complying with COVID restrictions and getting the jab.

New Testing Steerage Goals to Decrease Case Charges

One easy approach to lower down circumstances is to restrict testing, and that’s one other U-turn we’re now seeing. The CDC is now saying you shouldn’t retest when you’ve recovered from COVID. Should you take a look at constructive, simply quarantine for 5 days and don’t retest to substantiate that you simply’re destructive, because the PCR can present false positives for as much as 12 weeks after the an infection has been resolved.

Nicely, we’ve recognized this for almost two years already. From the beginning, consultants warned that the PCR can’t be used to diagnose an energetic an infection, as it could choose up RNA from useless, noninfectious viral particles.

Well being authorities are actually spinning the story that these revisions in steerage are as a result of we’ve two years’ price of knowledge, they usually’re simply following the science. However that’s pure baloney, seeing how the info by no means supported their COVID restrictions within the first place. 

The CDC’s choice to revise quarantine tips down from 10 days to only 5 days additionally seems politically motivated. Polls present the economic system is a major concern of voting Individuals proper now, so they should strike a steadiness between the specified demolition of the economic system and maintaining individuals at work — at the very least till the 2022 elections are over.

In brief, I believe most if not the entire latest modifications in COVID steerage is to construct a story that the Biden administration has efficiently introduced the pandemic beneath management and reestablished a working economic system. The change in narrative relies on political technique, not science.

CDC Highlights Position of Comorbidities in Vaxxed COVID Deaths

rochelle walensky

>>>>> Click on right here <<<<<

As famous by Paul within the Liberty Report above, Walensky not too long ago said that 75% of COVID deaths had 4 or extra comorbidities, “So, actually, these are individuals who had been unwell to start with.” The admission went viral and was cited as proof that COVID is a deadly threat for none however the sickest amongst us.

The CDC shortly stepped in, clarifying that she meant “75% of COVID deaths amongst those that have acquired the COVID jab,” not COVID deaths general.9 You’ll be able to see the unedited section above, the place that context is made clear. Nonetheless, we all know that COVID poses little or no threat for wholesome unvaccinated individuals as nicely, and that comorbidities are a major threat issue no matter your COVID jab standing.

COVID Dying Threat Has All the time Been Low — Vaxxed or Not

For instance, a 2020 research10 discovered 88% of hospitalized COVID sufferers in New York Metropolis had two or extra comorbidities, 6.3% had one underlying well being situation and 6.1% had none.

In late August 2020, the CDC printed information exhibiting solely 6% of the full demise rely had COVID-19 listed as the only reason for demise. The remaining 94% had had a mean of two.6 comorbidities or preexisting well being circumstances that contributed to their deaths.11 So, sure, COVID is a deadly threat just for the sickest amongst us, simply as Walensky mentioned, however that’s true whether or not you’re “vaccinated” or not.

As for the research12 Walensky mentioned in that “Good Morning America” section, it discovered that of the 1.2 million COVID jabbed topics, solely 0.0033% died of COVID between December 2020 and October 2021. (And of these, 77.8% had 4 or extra comorbidities.) This research, Walensky claims as proof that the COVID shot works wonders to cut back the chance of demise.

However does it actually? Recall research13 exhibiting the noninstitutionalized an infection fatality charge is on common simply 0.26% to start with, and other people beneath the age of 40 have solely a 0.01% threat of dying from COVID.14

After we’re speaking a couple of fraction of a proportion level threat, we’re speaking a couple of threat that’s near statistical zero. So, does reducing your threat of demise from 0.01% to 0.003% actually translate into one thing worthwhile? And, extra importantly, is that discount definitely worth the dangers concerned with taking the jab?

Clearly, it’s not a risk-free choice. OneAmerica, a nationwide mutual life insurance coverage firm, not too long ago warned that all-cause deaths amongst working age Individuals (18 to 64) are up 40% over prepandemic norms,15 they usually can’t be attributed to COVID.

So, what’s inflicting these deaths? What doubtlessly lethal factor did tens of tens of millions of Individuals do in 2021 that they’ve by no means completed earlier than? I’ll allow you to ponder whether or not Walensky’s declare that the COVID jab is saving lives is an correct one.

CDC Admits Massive Portion of ‘COVID Sufferers’ Aren’t

In one other latest media look, Walensky said that:16

“In some hospitals that we have talked to, as much as 40% of the sufferers who’re coming in with COVID-19 are coming in not as a result of they’re sick with COVID, however as a result of they’re coming in with one thing else and have had … COVID or the Omicron variant detected.”

This, once more, is one thing that we’ve been highlighting for the reason that begin of the pandemic. Most so-called “COVID sufferers” merely weren’t, and nonetheless aren’t. They’re hospitalized for one thing else completely, and simply occur to get a constructive take a look at consequence upon admission — which very presumably is a false constructive. Both method, voila, they’re a COVID affected person, though they’re hospitalized for a damaged leg or a coronary heart assault.

As famous by Delta Information TV, “Feedback like these have forged doubt on the severity of the present COVID surge even because the Supreme Courtroom considers authorized challenges to Biden’s sweeping personal sector mandates on that very situation.”17

Is the Political Pandemic in Its Closing Dying Throes?

In a January 10, 2022, weblog submit,18 Jeff Childers, an legal professional, and the president and founding father of Childers Legislation agency, presents a speculation for why we may be wanting on the finish of the pandemic, because the Biden administration has “no cheap various however to wrap this complete factor up within the subsequent 60 days or so.”

“There’s an attention-grabbing political dynamic shaping up, a type of political vice grip that may simply be driving federal COVID coverage towards authenticity and an finish to the pandemic … a variety of actuality has been breaking by these days,” Childers writes.19

He factors out how a federal decide not too long ago ordered the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration to launch all of the Pfizer COVID jab information that the company needed 75 years to launch. The majority of that information is now due March 1, 2022, the day of Biden’s State of the Union tackle. Childers suspects the Pfizer paperwork will comprise loads of counternarrative fodder and politically embarrassing particulars.

Why We’re Seeing a U-Flip within the Narrative Now

Biden wants some excellent news by his State of the Union tackle, because it’ll be his final likelihood to “assist transfer the needle again towards blue,” and the best way he can do that’s by declaring the pandemic over. He can then declare to be the nice liberator who ended the pandemic measures for good.

“In the event that they deal with this proper, they can provide their voting base and sycophantic media brokers all the mandatory speaking factors to spice up Dem prospects for the midterm elections,” Childers writes.20

However to drag off that U-turn with any semblance of credibility, they’ve to start out chopping the case charge now, and that’s exactly what we’re seeing. For instance, the CDC not too long ago modified its tips so that you don’t have to retest after you’ve recovered from COVID, so no extra false positives from recovered individuals.

Florida’s official coverage is now to solely take a look at high-risk people and those that are symptomatic. Childers factors out that the left-leaning Solar Sentinel even ran an article highlighting the truth that regardless of surging case charges, Florida has the bottom COVID demise charge within the nation, second solely to the sparsely populated Alaska. “What extremely highly effective pressure may make the Solar Sentinel downplay the pandemic like this?” he asks.

Will We Lastly Get a Extra Correct Dying Rely?

The CDC additionally seems poised to vary the definition of COVID demise to what it ought to have been all alongside. Childers notes:

“Fox Information … Bret Baier … requested [Walensky] ‘how most of the 836,000 deaths within the U.S. linked to COVID are FROM COVID or what number of are WITH COVID?’

Director Walensky mentioned … ‘these information will likely be forthcoming.’ Till about 10 minutes in the past, the CDC mentioned it didn’t HAVE any approach to observe that type of data … However now, apparently, CDC plans to launch details about deaths from and with. What do you need to guess they’ll be REDUCING whole COVID deaths shortly? By rather a lot.”

They’re additionally beginning to precisely rely solely those that are literally sick with COVID slightly than together with individuals hospitalized for different causes who simply occur to check constructive.

“Yesterday, New York Governor Hochul introduced that nearly HALF of sufferers are hospitalized for ‘non-COVID causes,’ scattering the rotting corpse of the Narrative.

You would possibly recall that simply final week she ordered hospitals to start out breaking down the reported figures and exhibiting what number of people ACTUALLY are sick with COVID versus simply testing constructive within the hospital. We’ve been yelling about overcounting hospitalizations for 2 years now they usually simply seen?”21

Identical Narrative Swap Seen in Europe

The identical sudden change in narrative could be seen in Europe. Childers continues:22

“Yesterday, the Guardian UK ran a narrative headlined, ‘Finish mass jabs and dwell with COVID, says ex-head of vaccine taskforce.’ It says Dr. Clive Dix — former chairman of the UK’s vaccine taskforce — has known as for a ‘main rethink’ of the UK’s COVID technique, in impact reversing the strategy of the previous two years and returning to a ‘new normality.’

Surprising the cores the oft-maligned authors of the Nice Barrington Declaration, Dr. Dix — with out getting cancelled — mentioned this:

‘We have to analyze whether or not we use the present booster marketing campaign to make sure the weak are protected, if that is seen to be obligatory … Mass population-based vaccination within the UK ought to now finish.’ Ending mass vaccinations? Out of the blue that concept is okay to debate within the company media? Wow.”

In a January 3, 2022, interview with the Day by day Telegraph, professor Andrew Pollard, head of the U.Okay.’s Committee on Vaccination and Immunization who helped create the Oxford-AstraZeneca shot, additionally made a beforehand verboten assertion: “We are able to’t vaccinate the planet each 4 or six months,” he mentioned. “It’s not sustainable or reasonably priced.”23 And, like Dix, Pollard was not canceled, censored or deplatformed.

January 11, 2022, Bloomberg additionally reported that “European Union regulators warned that frequent COVID-19 booster pictures may adversely have an effect on the immune response and will not be possible. Repeat booster doses each 4 months may finally weaken the immune response and tire out individuals, in response to the European Medicines Company.”24

Marco Cavaleri, the EMA’s head of vaccines technique, mentioned throughout a January 11, 2022, press briefing:25

“Whereas use of extra boosters could be a part of contingency plans, repeated vaccinations inside brief intervals wouldn’t signify a sustainable long-term technique. [Boosters] could be completed as soon as, or perhaps twice, but it surely’s not one thing that we are able to suppose needs to be repeated always. We’d like to consider how we are able to transition from the present pandemic setting to a extra endemic setting.”

That very same day, the World Well being Group’s Technical Advisory Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Composition (TAG-CO-VAC) additionally issued an announcement26 saying that “a vaccination technique based mostly on repeated booster doses of the unique vaccine composition is unlikely to be applicable or sustainable.”

Additionally they said that COVID vaccines that truly stop an infection and transmission have to be developed. The timing of all these statements is nothing if not exceptional. It reveals simply how coordinated this plandemic narrative is, all world wide.

Justice Sotomayor Known as Out

Maybe the very best instance that the narrative is present process a radical overhaul, Childers says, is Supreme Courtroom Justice Sonia Sotomayor being reality checked and known as out as a liar by The Washington Publish:

“You’ll recall that Sotomayor confidently instructed the legal professionals throughout oral argument Friday that ‘100,000’ youngsters had been in essential care and on ventilators with Omicron. The legal professionals didn’t problem her though there aren’t that many whole ICU beds in the entire nation.

However on Saturday — the subsequent day! — the Washington Publish ran an article headlined, ‘Sotomayor’s false declare that ‘over 100,000’ youngsters are in ‘critical situation’ with COVID.’ FALSE CLAIM?? What?? Right here’s how the fact-checking article ended:

‘It’s vital for Supreme Courtroom justices to make rulings based mostly on appropriate information … However Sotomayor throughout an oral argument provided a determine — 100,000 youngsters in ‘critical situation … many on ventilators’ — that’s absurdly excessive. She earns 4 Pinocchios.’ It may be unprecedented for a serious liberal newspaper to name out a liberal Justice. What could possibly be occurring? …

There appears to be a LOT of sudden momentum surging within the route of ending the pandemic. If I’m proper, we’re going to see much more of this, and fairly shortly, since Biden has to wrap it up in time to declare victory on March 1. Which might clarify why they pushed the SOTU again a month. They want the time to get the pandemic wrapped up.”27

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Electronic Vault
Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)