Should you might solely hear to 1 podcast to rise up to hurry on COVD-19, you’re in luck as one of many high clinicians on the planet on understanding COVID-19, Dr. Peter McCullough, lastly made his technique to the most important podcast on the planet, Joe Rogan and, as anticipated, it was epic. You’ll do your self a severe disservice for those who do not watch all the, practically three-hour, interview at regular pace.
McCullough is an internist, heart specialist and epidemiologist, and on this podcast, he evaluations and summarizes what we all know concerning the COVID jabs. McCullough additionally discusses the significance of early therapy, which has been universally suppressed and ignored from the beginning.
He is satisfied, and states unequivocally on this interview, that of the COVID-19 deaths within the U.S., none obtained sufficient and/or early-enough therapy. In brief, individuals didn’t, and positively do not now, must die from this an infection, barring some severe underlying situation.
It is treatable, and later variants, comparable to Delta and Omicron, seem typically milder than the unique virus, leading to even easier-to-treat sickness. From early on, researchers and clinicians demonstrated that early therapy, be it with hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin or steroids and anticoagulants — in some mixture — resulted in much better outcomes and saved lives.
While you simply let the an infection run its course with out therapy, most COVID-19 sufferers have been riddled with blood clots and different issues by the point they have been hospitalized. Based on McCullough, we all know that not less than 85% of all COVID deaths might have been prevented with early therapy.
Early Remedy Is Key
In August 2020, McCullough’s landmark paper “Pathophysiological Foundation and Rationale for Early Outpatient Remedy of SARS-CoV-2 An infection” was revealed on-line within the American Journal of Medication.1
It was the primary revealed report on how one can deal with COVID on an outpatient foundation and described a complete COVID therapy protocol for frontline docs. Earlier than this, there have been about 4,000 papers discussing the potential profit of assorted cures, however none that truly sought to current a complete protocol for therapy.
A follow-up paper, “Multifaceted Extremely Focused Sequential Multidrug Remedy of Early Ambulatory Excessive-Threat SARS-CoV-2 An infection (COVID-19)” revealed in Critiques in Cardiovascular Medication in December 2020,2 grew to become the idea for an AAPS dwelling therapy information.
Importantly, McCullough and the staff of collaborators he put collectively understood early on that there have been three parts to this an infection: viral replication, cytokine storm and blood clotting, subsequently necessitating a multidrug strategy.
One drug that gained early consideration was hydroxychloroquine, as analysis revealed in 2006 confirmed it lowered viral replication of SARS-CoV-1 (the unique SARS virus). It additionally has well-established anti-inflammatory properties. It has been routinely used within the therapy of lupus, for instance. However as defined by McCullough, there have been clear intentional efforts to stop use of the drug in opposition to COVID-19.
The U.S. authorities refused to launch its stockpiles, and docs have been informed they’d lose their medical license in the event that they used it. The biggest manufacturing plant of hydroxychloroquine even mysteriously burned down, and in South Africa, “mercenaries” have been breaking into pharmacies and burning the drug.
Along with that, a fraudulent paper was revealed within the journal Lancet, falsely stating that hydroxychloroquine was harmful. “It regarded prefer it was a step to bury hydroxychloroquine as a therapy,” McCullough says. When focus shifted to ivermectin, that drug additionally grew to become inaccessible and was broadly vilified as “horse paste” within the mainstream media.
Remedy Was Suppressed for a Cause
Contemplating the overwhelming success docs have had in treating the an infection with these and different medicine, why aren’t hospitals all over the place doing it? Why have well being authorities fought in opposition to therapy generally, and the usage of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin specifically? In McCullough’s phrases:
“It appears to me, early on, there was an intentional, very complete suppression of early therapy so as to promote concern, struggling, isolation, hospitalization and dying. And it gave the impression to be fully organized and intentional so as to create acceptance for after which promote mass ‘vaccination.'”
The plan to create acceptance for novel mRNA gene switch know-how in lieu of a traditional vaccine by suppressing therapy choices has been defined intimately in Dr. Peter Breggin’s guide, “COVID-19 and the World Predators: We Are the Prey,”3 and Pamela Popper’s guide, “COVID Operation: What Occurred, Why It Occurred and What’s Subsequent.”4 McCullough recommends each, if you wish to perceive how this was coordinated and deliberate.
Robert Kennedy Jr.’s guide, “The Actual Anthony Fauci” additionally exhibits, utilizing intensive documentation, that Moderna was engaged on an mRNA injection for COVID-19 properly earlier than the world even knew it existed. He reveals intensive collusion occurred to push this novel gene switch know-how on the world, with devastating results.
When requested why extra docs aren’t utilizing these early therapy protocols, McCullough factors out that of the 1 million or so docs within the U.S., most likely solely 500 or so really perceive that viable therapies are being suppressed with the intent to drive uptake of the gene switch photographs. These comparatively few who do perceive what is going on on face censorship and the specter of having their medical license eliminated in the event that they converse out about therapy.
Questions About Reinfection Linger
A widespread concern that Rogan brings up is whether or not or not you possibly can really get COVID twice. Based on McCullough, the reply is a tough no. You can not. You would possibly assume you might have it twice, since you’ve examined optimistic.
After intense stress to supply proof of reinfection, the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention lastly admitted they do not have a single verified case of somebody getting sick with COVID twice.
To show reinfection, McCullough says, you’d must have a optimistic PCR check at a cycle threshold under 28 (not 40 or 45, as is routinely completed), and a optimistic antigen immunoassay check to point out that you simply really had antibodies from the primary an infection, and a gene sequencing check displaying you in actual fact have the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
What’s extra, dozens of research affirm that pure immunity is powerful and long-lasting. “So why is there a lot resistance to the concept individuals have pure immunity?” Rogan asks, to which McCullough replies, “All roads result in the ‘vaccine.'”
Dr. Robert Malone disagrees with McCullough on this situation, pointing to a December 4, 2021, examine displaying 12% out of a pattern of 1,200 people skilled COVID reinfection.5 In a Twitter submit, Malone stated:6
“I’ve caught it twice, as has my spouse. I used to be asymptomatic, she was not. This can be a quickly mutating RNA virus. Similar to the widespread chilly. The signs won’t be as extreme — however sure, individuals catch it greater than as soon as. Even Delta …”
Relative Versus Absolute Threat Discount
Now, relating to the efficacy of those COVID photographs, the producers have employed a basic technique to mislead the lots and make the photographs sound much better than they really are. That technique is relative threat discount somewhat than absolute threat discount.
Whereas the COVID photographs boasted efficacy charges between 67% and 95% on the outset, these have been the relative threat reductions. The 4 accessible COVID photographs within the U.S. present an absolute threat discount between simply 0.7% and 1.3%.7,8
Now, examine that to the noninstitutionalized an infection fatality ratio throughout age teams, which is 0.26%.9 Because the absolute threat that must be overcome is decrease than absolutely the threat discount these injections can present, mass vaccination merely can’t have a good impression. But right here we’re, being informed to get used to the concept of getting booster photographs at ever-increasing intervals. It simply would not add up.
After all, as I’ve reported on a number of events, analysis and medical expertise clearly present that the effectiveness of those photographs quickly wanes. Six months after the second dose, your safety is nil. In the meantime, your physique continues producing poisonous spike protein for not less than 15 months after every dose.
Efficacy Quickly Wanes
McCullough cites a Swedish examine10 revealed October 25, 2021, which checked out information from 842,974 pairs, the place every one who had obtained two COVID jabs was paired and in contrast in opposition to an unvaccinated particular person, to see if the vaccinated had fewer symptomatic circumstances and hospitalizations.
Early on, the double-jabbed appeared to have good safety, however that shortly modified. The Pfizer jab went from 92% effectiveness at Day 15 by 30, to 47% at Day 121 by 180, and nil from Day 201 onward. The Moderna shot had an analogous trajectory, being estimated at 59% from Day 181 onward. The AstraZeneca injection had a decrease effectiveness out of the gate, waned sooner than the mRNA photographs, and had no detectable effectiveness as of Day 121.
All of the whereas, tens of millions of Individuals have already had COVID11 and have pure immunity that does not wane on this method. But they’re being shunned and fired for not complying with COVID jab mandates. Once more, it simply would not add up. By no means earlier than has a vaccine been required for anybody with pure immunity in opposition to a illness, and there is good cause for that. It is fully illogical.
Similar to you do not want a measles vaccine for those who’ve had measles, you do not want a COVID shot for those who’ve had COVID. In truth, you’re at elevated threat of opposed occasions for those who do take it. Keep in mind, if you have already got pure immunity, you are exposing your self to the harms of the shot with no hope of profit.
The Most Harmful Injections in Medical Historical past
As defined on this interview, the COVID photographs are essentially the most harmful, most deadly medicine ever used — and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and CDC knew this as early as mid-February, when the deaths reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adversarial Occasions Reporting System (VAERS) hit 182.
Traditionally, any drug with 5 unexplained deaths will get a black field warning. At 50 unresolved deaths, it is pulled from the market altogether. None of that occurred right here. To this present day, the FDA and CDC declare not a single dying is attributable to the COVID photographs, even because the reported dying toll is nearing 20,00012 (together with worldwide stories), with half of them occurring inside 48 hours of the injection. Eighty % happen inside every week post-injection.
That’s merely exceptional. The temporal affiliation is stronger than something we have seen earlier than. McCullough additionally cites analysis concluding that in 86% of circumstances, there was no different clarification for the dying aside from the COVID shot.
McCullough factors out that in any given yr, a mean of 150 deaths following vaccination are reported to VAERS. That is 150 deaths from a mean of 278 million vaccine doses given.
Right here, we had 182 deaths at a cut-off date when solely 27 million doses had been administered. So, you can’t blame it on the amount of photographs given. The identical developments might be present in different nations’ databases as properly, such because the U.Ok.’s Yellow Card scheme.
What’s extra, vaccine unwanted effects are notoriously underreported, in order staggering because the VAERS information are, they’re simply the tip of the iceberg. Traditionally, just one%13 to 10%14 of opposed results are reported. For the COVID photographs, the underreporting issue has been calculated to be anyplace between 31 and 100. That signifies that to get a extra correct vary, you need to multiply the VAERS quantity by 31 and 100.
Absolutely the most-conservative estimate thus far is an underreporting issue of 5. That estimate got here from an FDA whistleblower who used Facilities for Medicare and Medicaid Companies information to estimate the underreporting in VAERS.15 Based on that whistleblower, the variety of Individuals killed by the photographs was not less than 45,000 as of July 9, 2021. At the moment, VAERS reported 9,048 deaths following COVID injection.
Who’s at Best Threat for COVID Jab Aspect Results?
As defined by McCullough, one of many causes for this huge dying toll is the truth that the COVID shot introduces an uncontrolled dose of spike protein into your physique — a far higher dose than what you get when naturally contaminated with the virus. And the spike protein is essentially the most deadly a part of the virus. It is accountable for essentially the most problematic signs of an infection.
So, the photographs are killing the identical individuals that will be in dire straits have been they contaminated by the virus. It is also killing some who would doubtless fare OK with the wild virus however can’t deal with the extreme spike protein load produced by the COVID shot.
Constant Knowledge Level to Clear and Current Hazard
As famous by McCullough, we have now a really clear security sign from VAERS. We even have clear organic plausibility, which means we are able to clarify why and the way individuals may be harmed by these photographs. The information are additionally internally and externally constant, inside VAERS and databases in different nations. The identical patterns are seen all over the place.
Usually affiliation doesn’t imply causality except very particular standards are met, and within the case of the COVID jabs, these standards are certainly met. “We have fulfilled what’s known as the Bradford Hill standards for causality,” McCullough says. In different phrases, we have now proof that the accidents and deaths aren’t unintentional. The COVID photographs are certainly injuring and killing individuals at unprecedented charges, regardless of what the mendacity CDC states.
Myocarditis Will Probably Be Widespread
Curiously, the photographs seem to hurt women and men in a different way. Girls are having far increased charges of neurological accidents, whereas boys and younger males account for some 80% of myocarditis (coronary heart irritation). Simply how dangerous is the myocarditis wave?
Analysis revealed in 201716 calculated the background fee of myocarditis in youngsters and youth, displaying it happens at a fee of 4 circumstances per million per yr. Assuming there are 60 million American youngsters, the background fee for myocarditis can be 240 circumstances a yr.
What number of circumstances of myocarditis have been reported to VAERS following COVID injection thus far? 16,918 as of December 3, 2021,17 and it is going up by a number of hundred to a few thousand each week. We’re additionally seeing myocarditis in grownup males.
“Docs have by no means seen so many circumstances of myocarditis,” McCullough says. “It’s frequent, and it’s extreme.” Sufferers require coronary heart treatment, and should stay sedentary for prolonged intervals of time. Whereas myocarditis is usually a nonfatal opposed occasion, it could possibly shave years off your life.
Analysis revealed in 2019 confirmed 13% of myocarditis circumstances finally ends up with progressive coronary heart failure. Their hearts simply by no means absolutely get better from the injury. Within the examine, one other 36% improved however by no means absolutely recovered.
“My concern is, a few of these youngsters who develop myocarditis shall be within the 13% class the place they’ve progressive left ventricle dysfunction and coronary heart failure,” McCullough says.
Whereas we do not but know precisely how COVID jab myocarditis compares to naturally-occurring myocarditis, the info we at the moment have counsel the injury incurred by the spike protein is somewhat extreme.
Based on McCullough, 86% of youth who develop myocarditis in response to the jab are sick sufficient to require hospitalization. Analysis additionally exhibits younger boys are way more prone to be hospitalized with myocarditis than they’re being hospitalized with COVID-19, McCullough says.
Should you’ve taken one or two COVID jabs months in the past and nothing dangerous occurred, rely your blessings. You are among the many fortunate ones. Should you persist in taking boosters, nonetheless, your luck might be going to expire sooner or later. It is actually solely a matter of time earlier than the quantity of spike protein in your system overwhelms it, producing noticeable injury.
Once more, proof suggests the spike protein might stay for 15 months post-injection. McCullough believes it would final not less than a yr after every dose. Should you begin getting boosters each three to 6 months, you are by no means going to do away with that spike protein.
You will be including increasingly more with every dose, and it is the identical spike protein that causes issues in COVID-19. Should you concern COVID-19, you should be simply as afraid of the COVID photographs, if no more so, as you find yourself with way more spike protein from the shot than you do from the pure an infection.
At this cut-off date, the proof is clearly weighing in opposition to the COVID photographs. They’re inflicting way more hurt than good, particularly amongst youngsters, who aren’t at excessive threat of dying from COVID-19 within the first place.