Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D., is a molecular biologist and toxicologist and director of toxicology and molecular biology for Toxicology Assist Companies LLC. April 23, 2021, she delivered a three-minute public remark to the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
Her experience is evaluation of pharmacological dose-responses, mechanistic biology and complicated toxicity dynamics. In her ACIP remark (see video beneath), Lindsay described how she aided the event of a contraceptive vaccine within the Nineteen Nineties that ended up inflicting unintended autoimmune destruction and sterility in animals which, regardless of cautious pre-analysis, had not been predicted. She explains:
“We have been growing what was meant to be a brief contraceptive vaccine, which was very enticing as a result of it prevented fertilization fairly than stopping implantation — or it ought to have; that was the thought.
Sadly, though fairly a bit of study was accomplished in several animal fashions to make it possible for it didn’t have an autoimmune motion, it did find yourself having an autoimmune motion and prompted full ovarian destruction.
Now it is utilized in that method [for permanent sterilization] in canine, cats and different animals. So, that is a cautionary story of how animal research may also help us keep away from errors in people once they’re used correctly, and when correct animal research are accomplished.”
We Could Be Sterilizing an Complete Era
On the time, she known as for an instantaneous halt to COVID-19 mRNA and DNA vaccines because of security considerations on a number of fronts. Specifically, she famous there may be credible concern that they’ll cross-react with syncytin (a retroviral envelope protein) and reproductive genes in sperm, ova and placenta in ways in which could “impair fertility and reproductive outcomes.”
Not a single research has disproven this speculation, she famous. One other idea of how these injections may impair fertility will be present in a 2006 research,1 which confirmed sperm can take up international mRNA, convert it into DNA, and launch it as little pellets (plasmids) within the medium across the fertilized egg.
The embryo then takes up these plasmids and carries them (sustains and clones them into lots of the daughter cells) all through its life, even passing them on to future generations. It’s doable that the pseudo-exosomes which can be the mRNA contents can be good for supplying the sperm with mRNA for the spike protein.
So, doubtlessly, a vaccinated lady who will get pregnant with an embryo that may (through the sperms’ plasmids) synthesize the spike protein in line with the directions within the vaccine, would have an immune capability to assault that embryo due to the “international” protein it shows on its cells. This then would trigger a miscarriage.
“We may doubtlessly be sterilizing a whole technology,” Lindsey warned. The truth that there have been stay births following COVID-19 vaccination will not be proof that these injections don’t have a reproductive impact, she mentioned.
Lindsay additionally identified that studies of menstrual irregularities and vaginal hemorrhaging in girls who’ve obtained the injections quantity within the hundreds,2,3,4 and this too hints at reproductive results. On this interview, we dive deeper into these mechanisms.
One thing Has Gone Horribly Mistaken
When requested how she ended up getting so passionately concerned on this controversial matter, Lindsay replies:
“I took an interest within the subject as a result of science was not making sense anymore. As an illustration, herd immunity was being redefined. Herd immunity has all the time been outlined by a mix of the pure an infection with vaccination practices that work.
Immediately, herd immunity was modified to solely being attained by means of vaccination, and I knew that that was horribly flawed, but it was being touted in all places. It was definitely being touted by [Dr. Anthony] Fauci and others who know higher.
Different issues have been additionally occurring throughout the scientific world. Two of our prime tier journals, The New England Journal of Drugs and The Lancet, revealed fraudulent hydroxychloroquine research.
Ostensibly that they had gone by means of peer evaluation, and it ought to’ve been simple to catch the errors in these research — in addition to many different research that enable for the emergency use authorization of those gene therapies — they usually weren’t caught.
Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are very protected. They have been used safely in pregnant girls and youngsters for many years, and all of the sudden they have been being vilified as in the event that they weren’t protected. As a toxicologist, I do know they’re protected.
So, some of these issues actually piqued my consideration together with the entire stuff happening within the background with respect to the New World Order and the agenda set by the World Financial Discussion board, and our becoming a member of into this, together with so many different nations, regardless of their intent, their supplies, which declare life shall be modified as we all know it.
We are going to ‘personal nothing and be comfortable [about it]’ in just some years. All of these items converged for me into a way that one thing had gone horribly flawed, that our regulatory institutes have been captured, and that our scientific journals weren’t being sincere anymore …
There is a paper that got here out in 2006 known as ‘Illness Mitigation Measures within the Management of Pandemic Influenza.’5 This paper is fantastic. It goes by means of World Well being Group and CDC tips on find out how to react throughout a pandemic, what works and what does not work, and it clearly factors out that masks do not work.
They knew at that time they do not work. Journey lockdowns do not work. It is a fantastic paper to mainly undergo every little thing we have now accomplished in response to this pandemic, and say that is an inappropriate method to reply, and we have now scientific knowledge that proves it. So, I encourage everyone to return to that paper … to essentially see how loopy we have gotten within the mandates that make no scientific sense in any respect.”
Huge Hazard Sign Is Being Ignored
As famous by Lindsay, within the case of the COVID photographs, necessary animal research that assist confirm poisonous and systemic results weren’t accomplished. However we’re nonetheless seeing hazard indicators that should be heeded.
Preliminary security outcomes of mRNA COVID photographs utilized in pregnant girls, based mostly on knowledge from the V-Protected Registry, have been revealed in The New England Journal of Drugs (NEJM) in April 2021.6
In accordance with this paper, the miscarriage charge throughout the first 20 weeks of being pregnant was 12.5%, which is just barely above the traditional common of 10%. (Taking a look at statistical knowledge, the chance of miscarriage drops from an total, common danger charge of 21.3% all through the being pregnant as a complete, to simply 5% between Weeks 6 and seven, all the best way all the way down to 1% between Weeks 14 and 20.7)
Nevertheless, there’s a definite downside with this calculation, as highlighted by Drs. Ira Bernstein and Sanja Jovanovic, and Deann McLeod, HBSc, of Toronto. In a Could 28, 2021, letter to the editor, they identified that:8
“In desk 4, the authors report a charge of spontaneous abortions <20 weeks (SA) of 12.5% (104 abortions/827 accomplished pregnancies). Nevertheless, this charge must be based mostly on the variety of girls who have been liable to an SA because of vaccine receipt and may exclude the 700 girls who have been vaccinated of their third-trimester (104/127 = 82%).”
In different phrases, whenever you exclude girls who bought the shot of their third trimester (because the third trimester is AFTER week 20 and due to this fact shouldn’t be counted when figuring out miscarriage charge amongst these injected BEFORE week 20), the miscarriage charge is a whopping 82%.
Of these 104 miscarriages, 96 of them occurred earlier than 13 weeks of gestation, which strongly means that getting a COVID shot throughout the first trimester is an absolute recipe for catastrophe.
“They concluded, very fraudulently, in my estimation, that it was protected to vaccinate within the third trimester, and mentioned nothing in regards to the clear security sign within the first trimester,” Lindsay says. “It’s simply so dishonest, so purposefully manipulative.”
As for the ladies who get the shot of their third trimester, there’s nonetheless no telling what the ramifications is likely to be in the long run.
“We simply do not know, and that is the issue,” Lindsay says. “There are all types of issues that may go flawed with some of these therapies, and have gone flawed in animal fashions. We do not know what’s going to occur sooner or later for these girls or for his or her youngsters. This could possibly be handed on.
We’re seeing now numerous point out of constitutive expression, whether or not that is failure of the mRNA to degrade or integration into the genome. That is nonetheless being investigated.”
Youngsters Are Dying From COVID Jab-Induced Myocarditis
Lindsay goes on to quote a CDC report that reveals greater than 300 youngsters between the ages of 12 and 18 have died from myocarditis, a now-recognized aspect impact of the COVID jab.
We additionally know, based mostly partly on whistleblower testimony, that greater than 50,000 People have died inside three days of those photographs,9,10 and that’s simply from one database (the Vaccine Hostile Occasion Reporting System or VAERS). There are 10 different databases that feed into the CDC that the general public doesn’t have entry to.
“This many deaths, it is appalling and alarming,” Lindsay says. “Dr. Peter McCullough says the protection sign for typical vaccines, apart from this gene remedy, would’ve been round 186 complete. We’re now as much as [17,128 reported deaths in VAERS, as of October 15, 202111], however they have not paused this in youngsters.
They haven’t paused this whereas they’re investigating the myocarditis. As an alternative, they’re pushing it much more. Has this ever occurred earlier than? I imply, does this occur in a situation the place the inhabitants is at primarily zero danger for the illness? …
The cardiac deaths alone in completely wholesome youngsters, and pulmonary embolism deaths in youngsters, ought to’ve stopped this. They’re at no danger [from COVID-19]. There is no such thing as a purpose to vaccinate them, completely zero purpose to present them these gene therapies as a result of they’re at no danger [from the infection] …
You realize [the shot] is inflicting coronary heart failure, pulmonary emboli, cardiac arrest in wholesome youngsters, and you are not pausing to analyze the chance versus reward situation? One thing is horribly flawed.
Sadly, our regulatory establishments are usually not going to cease this. They’ve clearly been captured. It is one thing that we will must do. Vaccinated and non-vaccinated should stand collectively to say, ‘No, you are not going to experiment on my youngsters’ …
With the RSV vaccines and the dengue fever vaccines, we had deaths in youngsters that have been a lot fewer in quantity that stopped these campaigns as nicely. It is very, very clear — if you do not get anything out of this interview with me, perceive that our regulatory and security businesses have been captured.
They don’t seem to be doing their job to guard you or your youngsters. You could not belief them, as a result of they aren’t doing something in line with practices that was adhered to. It is clear that they have been captured and compromised, and I hate to say that. I actually hate to say that, however that is the one logical reply …
We now have all these breakthrough circumstances too. If you happen to have a look at Michigan, and I’ve truly been aware of another databases of true dying numbers in several states [comparing] those that are vaccinated and those that do not, and I can inform you that the media is mendacity with respect to the unvaccinated making up 99% of hospitalizations. They’re completely mendacity.”
How the Jab Can Sabotage Fertility
Getting again to the fertility subject, Lindsay cites a Singaporean research that examined the COVID jab’s capability to intervene with fertility by triggering anti-syncytin-1. The research included 15 girls, two of whom have been pregnant. She explains:
“They did one thing that I had requested to be accomplished a very long time in the past, which was to measure anti-syncytin antibodies in an ELISA check. The syncytins are conformationally and genetically just like the [SARS-CoV-2] spike protein, this fusogenic spike protein.
The thought by a number of consultants was that you can have an autoimmune response to the syncytins by growing an immune response to the spike protein, after which that might stop profitable being pregnant.
However the syncytins are additionally necessary in quite a few psychological ailments, equivalent to bipolar despair. They’re necessary on autoimmune illness, lupus and a number of sclerosis. They’re current in skeletal muscle. There’s some affiliation with breast most cancers. They’re actually necessary historic retroviral parts.
What this research discovered was extraordinarily fascinating. It discovered that each single one in every of these girls who had been vaccinated developed autoantibodies to syncytin-1. Now, the authors sort of dismissed this and mentioned, ‘Oh, however we do not suppose that these antibodies have been excessive sufficient to imply something.’
However there was a transparent distinction between the pre-gene remedy sera [blood sample] and the post-therapy sera … What it reveals is that there’s an antibody response, and the importance of it, we do not actually know. However each single one of many girls developed an antibody response that was totally different from the baseline … and I feel that is in all probability what’s inflicting a few of these being pregnant losses.”
Are COVID Jabs a Inhabitants-Vast Immunocontraceptive?
When requested what she thinks the motive behind this mass injection marketing campaign is likely to be, contemplating the clear hazard indicators, she replies:
“I definitely suppose that to low cost that it’s a type of population-wide contraceptive can be naïve. There is a paper that got here out in 2005. It is known as ‘Analysis of Fusogenic Trophoblast Floor Epitopes as Targets for Immune Contraception.’12
This paper tried to search out contraceptive peptides in individuals that had infertility issues already that have been remoted to placentation. So, it was taking a backwards method, getting the sera from individuals who had fertility issues and attempting to see what that they had antibodies to that was inflicting the fertility issues …
This work was sponsored by the WHO and the Rockefeller Basis [and the National Institutes of Health]. No shock there. It was then picked up by an organization known as AplaGen that took it to patent in 2007.
These are 12-mer peptides, and there is a collection of eight of them that can be utilized to induce sterility. After they patented it, in addition they mentioned that it could possibly be used to ameliorate sterility. Curiously, it was additionally related to the entire issues that we all know syncytin is related to, — lupus, skeletal muscle problems, bipolar despair [and] quite a few different issues.
Though they do not identify syncytin proteins because the proteins which can be focused, they labored backwards from these peptides, after which mentioned they have been a collection of different proteins. Typically we all know that proteins will be known as the identical factor in several discovery realms. So, that is going to take extra analysis, nevertheless it was definitely fascinating to me.
What it actually factors out is that there have been efforts to make use of peptides or immunocontraceptive means on the placental trophoblast interface to trigger sterilization … So, it could be naïve to suppose that this was not on the plate for future use.”
How Lengthy Will Results Final?
An apparent query is, how lengthy may these results final? Are they lifelong? After all, any reply we provide you with right here shall be hypothetical solely, because the research merely haven’t been accomplished. That mentioned, together with her background in molecular biology, Lindsay is at the very least certified to theorize.
The mRNA is extraordinarily fragile, which is why a nanolipid with polyethylene glycol supply system is used. As well as, about 30% of the mRNA has been genetically modified to lower degradation. Because of this, the mRNA being injected is magnitudes sturdier than pure mRNA.
What’s extra, the nanoliposomes enable for superior penetration into tissues, and we now comprehend it spreads all through your physique. It doesn’t keep in your deltoid. How lengthy this modified and stabilized mRNA stays viable continues to be unknown, nevertheless. A corollary query is whether or not this mRNA is likely to be built-in into your genome to grow to be a everlasting fixture.
“The reply is, we do not know for certain,” Lindsay says. “After all, with the adenoviral vector vaccines [Janssen and AstraZeneca], they’re extra liable to integration into the genome. We all know that from animal research and previous experiments.
With the mRNA know-how, we have by no means stabilized one thing like this on this method. What we do know is that current research have come out — Bruce Patterson’s group and one other group — each got here out with the discovering that the spike protein is being expressed, [it’s] current on monocytes, as far out as from the time that the individuals got the gene remedy.
So, that provides us a sign that it’s resistant, for certain, to degradation. The longer it stays round, and is immune to degradation, the extra probably that genomic integration occasions can happen. However I do not know the reply as to if or not it’s going to grow to be a everlasting characteristic.”
Make a Rational Selection
As defined by Lindsay, no coronavirus vaccine has ever been efficiently dropped at market, regardless of 20 years of effort. All have failed because of antibody dependent enhancement, the place the vaccination facilitates an infection fairly than protects in opposition to it.
Now, we’re to imagine a protected and efficient coronavirus “vaccine” has been developed in mere months. She additionally makes one other necessary level. For the reason that COVID gene therapies don’t stop an infection, however solely reduce signs, they’re truly a therapy, not a prevention.
And there are far safer and more practical remedies obtainable, together with nebulized peroxide, ozone remedy, and hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin regimens.
“If all these gene therapies do is reduce the ailments, then they are not a vaccine, they’re a therapy,” she says. “They’re a therapy that you do not know the mid- or long-term penalties of, which have already prompted quite a few hostile occasions. You need to use your frequent sense to say, why would not I take advantage of a therapy that has been recognized to be protected over 70 years versus one that’s brand-new, that’s experimental?”
Different Security Indicators
Apart from fertility points, coronary heart irritation and blood clots, one other aspect impact seen among the many absolutely “vaccinated” is de novo Sort 1 diabetes in adults. This is smart contemplating Pfizer’s biodistribution research confirmed the spike protein accumulates within the pancreas. The pure SARS-CoV an infection also can have this impact.
Sort 1 diabetes is a significant issue, because it leaves you metabolically handicapped for the remainder of your life, depending on extraordinarily expensive insulin injections. Medical doctors are additionally reporting a rise in pancreatic most cancers and acute myeloid leukemia.
The place Do We Go From Right here?
“Many scientists and physicians really feel as I do, and try to determine the place we go from right here,” Lindsay says, “as a result of our typical security and regulatory businesses have been compromised.” She believes we have to proceed sharing the info and information that mainstream media refuse to debate, and proceed urging those that have obtained the jab to at the very least defend their youngsters.
“We have to stand collectively as one individuals and say we’re not going to just accept this, particularly not for our kids, and attempt to unravel this and see what’s actually behind all these efforts. Is it actually a couple of virus, or is it extra about different political motivations and campaigns, because it appears to be?”
I’m much less optimistic in regards to the thought of breaking by means of the brainwashing to get individuals to not sacrifice their youngsters. So many have their minds set in cement with the flawed info. They may have their brother, sister, mom or father get the shot and die with the needle nonetheless on their arm, they usually’d nonetheless exit to get a booster the following day.
I’ve seen it so many instances. My mates, their mother and father, their siblings and family members — there’s this barrier that stops any openness to new info. They’ve made their resolution. Mark Twain mentioned, “It’s miles simpler to idiot somebody than to persuade them they have been fooled.” And it is true.
So, whereas I agree that we should preserve attempting, and have religion that fact will prevail, I additionally suppose it’s necessary to have life like expectations. We’re up in opposition to the best propaganda marketing campaign in fashionable historical past. It’s psychological warfare at its greatest.
From my perspective, being a realistic realist, I imagine the most effective technique is to bolster and help those that didn’t purchase into the propaganda narrative to start with, as a result of they don’t wrestle with that cognitive dissonance. If we stick collectively and help one another, so none of us get sucked into the lunacy, then we are able to at the very least protect the management group.
In the end, the reality will come out, so long as we are able to protect the management group. In a 12 months or two, or three, we are going to clearly have the ability to inform how devastating this intervention was just by evaluating the 2 teams. I think those that bought the shot shall be severely crippled in numerous methods, and those that didn’t get the shot may have much better well being compared.
“I completely agree that we have now to protect a management group. We even have to consider ways in which we may also help these which have been injured. I introduced this out in a letter I lately wrote, advocating for Dr. McCullough.
Individuals who have gotten this inoculation, if they’ve mid- to long-term results, when you deny that any hostile results are actually happening, then the efforts going into these remedies for people who find themselves having unwanted side effects are usually not going to be there. We now have to just accept that these [side effects] are actual with a purpose to assist individuals who have already taken the inoculations, and I imagine we have now to strive.”