What Is COVID Injection Fatality Fee?

This story is a couple of very courageous researcher at Columbia College who co-authored a paper on dangers related to COVID vaccination (“vaccine-induced fatality fee”), in October 2021.

The researcher’s title is Spiro Pantazatos, Ph.D. He’s an Assistant Professor of Scientific Neurobiology (Psychiatry) at Columbia College. He’s additionally Analysis Scientist on the New York State Psychiatric Institute. The title of his paper (a preprint) is “COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality danger”:

“Correct estimates of COVID vaccine-induced extreme adversarial occasion and dying charges are essential for risk-benefit ratio analyses of vaccination and boosters in opposition to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in numerous age teams. Nevertheless, current surveillance research are usually not designed to reliably estimate life-threatening occasion or vaccine-induced fatality charges (VFR).

Right here, regional variation in vaccination charges was used to foretell all-cause mortality and non-COVID deaths in subsequent time intervals utilizing two unbiased, publicly out there datasets from the US and Europe (month-and week-level resolutions, respectively).”

At present Dr. Pantazatos is attempting to fund a house for this paper however all journals the place he submitted it have declined thus far.

Dr. Pantazatos was interviewed for the “Views on the Pandemic” sequence, and in my view, the interview got here out beautiful (with a disclaimer that the subject is ugly, so it’s a shocking interview a couple of horrible factor). Dr. Pantazatos’ presentation is so swish and even-headed that it could possibly be “the” video to ship to your mates who’ve been calling you loopy all this time!

Dr. Pantazatos’ Preliminary COVID Place Was 100% “Mainstream”

Early within the pandemic, Dr. Pantazatos was very moved by the vivid photographs that the media was feeding us — and, consequently, he grew to become petrified of the virus. His preliminary plan was to lockdown inside his home till the vaccines got here out.

What Compelled Him to Get Extra Skeptical

However then he began knowledge offered by scientists like John Ioannidis, for instance, and he shortly realized that the state of affairs was totally different from the one painted by the media.

Then Dr. Pantazatos’ co-author on this paper, Herve Seligmann, got here up with an evaluation of European knowledge displaying a constant pattern the place a vaccination marketing campaign gave the impression to be accompanied by a rise in all-cause mortality throughout the month following the vaccination marketing campaign.

Dr. Pantazatos didn’t like that conclusion very a lot because it implied the unthinkable, and so he determined to do his personal evaluation based mostly on the U.S. knowledge (vaccinations and all-cause mortality), printed by the CDC. And when he did his evaluation utilizing the U.S. knowledge, it confirmed the identical pattern. His evaluation of the CDC knowledge confirmed that following a vaccination marketing campaign in a given locality, there was a rise in all-cause mortality throughout the next month, adopted by a lower.

In Dr. Pantazatos’ opinion, the chance related to COVID injections is similar to the chance related to getting COVID — if the chance related to COVID is assessed on the excessive, early-in-the-pandemic stage. And on condition that the 2 dangers are comparable, and the injection dangers appear to extend with every subsequent does — and the pharma firms are pushing for boosters from right here into the horizon — he believes that we actually want to debate the VFR.

Why Rejection From the Journals Then?

Apparently, Dr. Pantazatos talked about within the interview that even earlier than 2020, he was effectively conscious of the truth that the method of getting scientific works printed in prestigious journals was tainted. He referred to the 2005 article in “PLOS Drugs” referred to as, “Medical Journals Are an Extension of the Advertising Arm of Pharmaceutical Firms” that talked about how precisely the journals are incentivized by pharma firms.

Moreover, scientists themselves have developed a behavior of buying and selling whole integrity of analysis for the status and advantages of getting their works printed — and so even earlier than 2020, it was not unusual for researchers to “therapeutic massage” the angle and many others. with a view to slot in. From myself, I wish to add the next quote from the Lancet:

“A lot of the scientific literature, maybe half, could merely be unfaithful. Bothered by research with small pattern sizes, tiny results, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of curiosity, along with an obsession for pursuing modern traits of doubtful significance, science has taken a flip in the direction of darkness,” wrote Richard Horton, the Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet in 2015.

By the way, I wrote an article about corruption within the medical institution final yr, in case you might be curious.

The Significance of Talking Out

Dr. Pantazatos shouldn’t be shy in any respect about sharing his evaluation, and he’s additionally tremendously swish and humble when presenting it. Personally, I’m very impressed by Dr. Pantazatos’ scientific integrity and his potential to truly “observe the science” — in addition to by the grace with which he presents this fairly ugly matter.

He believes the problem is necessary, and talking out is essential. His message for different scientists is to search out their voice and cease being silent.

Full transcript of the interview.

Concerning the Creator

To seek out extra of Tessa Lena’s work, make sure to take a look at her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Electronic Vault
Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)