What You Must Know Concerning the COVID Shot, and Extra

Within the video presentation above, Dr. Peter McCullough, a extremely credentialed and revealed heart specialist, internist and epidemiologist, and one of many main physicians main the cost to supply commonsense medical knowledge into COVID therapies, explains what the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is and the way it harms human biology — whether or not it comes from a pure SARS-CoV-2 an infection or a COVID jab.

The presentation was given on the Burleson, Texas, COVID Symposium: A Authorized Perspective, which streamed reside December 3, 2021. He begins by addressing the need for security each time a brand new biologic product is launched. Security just isn’t one thing we will merely ignore, it doesn’t matter what else is at stake. We should demand that no matter we’re given really meets some sort of security commonplace.

Warning bells began ringing in McCullough’s ears in the summertime of 2020, lengthy earlier than the COVID photographs have been rolled out. “I used to be telling lawmakers that we’ve acquired an issue,” McCullough says, as a result of corners have been being minimize that may lead to a harmful product. Security research, for instance, have been truncated all the way down to a mere two months, which doesn’t enable for enough analysis.

Why Did They Use Spike Protein?

He additionally had a number of different issues in regards to the improvement program. Notably, the photographs have been based mostly on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which by then we already realized is probably the most pathogenic a part of the virus, answerable for the worst signs of COVID-19, such because the irregular blood clotting seen in severely in poor health sufferers.

As defined by McCullough, the virus might be illustrated as a ball with spike-like protrusions on its floor. These spikes are what’s inflicting the issues.

“They’d been genetically altered and engineered in a lab in Wuhan, China” McCullough says, “to be notably infectious, and to be notably harmful once they get into the human physique.

The very last thing you need in your physique is a type of [spike proteins], not to mention billions of them as a result of [they] harm the mind, they harm the center, they harm bone marrow, they will tear up platelets and crimson blood cells. Very importantly, they harm blood vessels and trigger blood clotting.”

Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA photographs, and Janssen’s vector DNA shot, all inject genetic materials into your physique that applications your cells to start out producing the spike protein. They’re gene switch applied sciences.

Briefly, the photographs instruct your physique to provide a harmful protein inside its personal tissues. “We’ve by no means completed that earlier than within the historical past of drugs,” McCullough says, and for good motive: It’s a foul thought. “It’s nearly like a science fiction story going unhealthy,” he says.

The thought is that by making your physique produce this damaging spike protein, your physique will react and battle it off, thereby creating immunity. Nevertheless, within the course of, the spike protein can do near-incomprehensible harm. In some individuals, the spike protein is deadly.

Uncontrolled Spike Protein Manufacturing

What’s extra, now we have uncontrolled manufacturing of spike protein, each when it comes to amount and time. The Could 2021 paper,1 “Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected within the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients,” proved the spike protein circulated within the blood stream for a mean of 15 days’ post-injection. The longest was 29 days.

This refuted the declare that the mRNA merely stayed within the arm and didn’t flow into out of the injection web site. Logically, that declare doesn’t make a lot sense, and the Japanese authorities, early on, demanded Pfizer do a research to indicate them the place the injected mRNA really goes.

Pfizer did that biodistribution research,2 which confirmed each the mRNA and spike protein have been extensively distributed in animals’ our bodies. Specifically, it was discovered to build up within the ovaries. Regardless of that, the Pfizer biodistribution knowledge package deal reveals reproductive toxicology research have been eradicated within the curiosity of pace.

June 25, 2021, a paper was posted on the preprint server BioRxiv, exhibiting the S1 portion of the spike protein stays detectable for as much as 15 months after you recuperate from COVID-19.

“No marvel individuals have long-COVID syndrome,” McCullough says. “The physique is making an attempt to wash out this spike protein that’s not presupposed to be there, 15 months after you’ve had the an infection.”

McCullough factors out that Bruce Patterson, the Stanford scientist who led that research, additionally continues to search out the entire spike protein — each the S1 and S2 segments — in sufferers who acquired the COVID jab, months post-injection.

So, as of proper now, we don’t know when the spike protein manufacturing ceases. What we do know, with nice certainty, is that the spike protein damages the human physique and contributes to each acute and continual well being situations and illnesses.

Australia has already bought 14 doses of the COVID jabs for each particular person. That is meant to cowl them for seven years, at one dose each six months. As famous by McCullough, some individuals merely aren’t going to outlive that sort of steady and ever-increasing onslaught of spike protein.

Pressing Questions on Vaccine Security

Clear hazard alerts have been obvious in April 2021, and Could 24, 2021, McCullough revealed a paper together with 56 different worldwide scientists within the journal Authorea.3

The paper, “SARS-CoV-2 Mass Vaccination: Pressing Questions on Vaccine Security that Demand Solutions from Worldwide Well being Businesses, Regulatory Authorities, Governments and Vaccine Builders,” demanded the injections be pulled from the market except or till security issues are addressed. Key medical issues raised embrace:

The possibly hazardous mechanisms of motion of the photographs leading to cell, tissue and organ harm

The presence of dangerous spike protein in donated blood

Lack of genotoxicity, teratogenicity and oncogenicity research

The results of bioaccumulation in girls’s ovaries

The potential for decreased fertility

The shortage of an information and security monitoring board (DSMB) to supervise medical trials and post-market surveillance

The shortage of human ethics committee to supervise medical trials

The shortage of restrictions on exempted teams from randomized managed trials (RCTs) comparable to pregnant girls, girls of childbearing potential, COVID survivors (beforehand immune)

The shortage of danger stratification for hospitalization and dying within the medical trials

The shortage of knowledge transparency

The shortage of public danger mitigation (early and at-home therapy choices)

The paper was despatched to each well being and regulatory company on the planet. Right here we’re in early 2022 and, effectively, you’ll be able to see what the response was. It’s been nonexistent.

A Crucial Appraisal of VAERS

In October 2021, Jessica Rose, Ph.D., with the Institute for Pure and Utilized Data in Israel, revealed a report within the Science, Public Well being Coverage, and the Regulation journal.4 The report, “Crucial Appraisal of VAERS Pharmacovigilance: Is the US Vaccine Antagonistic Occasion Reporting System (VAERS) a Functioning Pharmacovigilance System?” particulars three main issues discovered:

  1. Deleted opposed occasion reviews involving COVID jab accidents
  2. Delayed entry of reviews
  3. Recoding of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Actions (MeDRA) phrases from extreme to delicate

It additionally contains bar plots exhibiting the acute distinction between the COVID photographs in comparison with all different vaccines in the marketplace. If the photographs have been protected, the variety of VAERS reviews would stay comparatively regular, not various a lot from earlier years, however what we see is a staggering spike in vaccine accidents reported in 2021.

The typical variety of opposed occasion reviews following vaccination for the previous 10 years has been about 39,000 yearly, with a mean of 155 deaths. That’s for all obtainable vaccines mixed.

The COVID jabs alone now account for 701,126 opposed occasions in U.S. territories as of December 17, 2021, together with 9,476 deaths. In the event you embrace worldwide reviews that make their means into the VAERS system, we’re 983,756 opposed occasion reviews and 20,622 deaths.5

As staggering as these numbers are, they’re simply the tip of the iceberg. Whenever you add within the underreporting issue, which is believed to be anyplace from 5 to 40, the numbers are merely astronomical.

VAERS is an early warning system and is meant to alert our authorities to probably hazardous vaccines as soon as they’ve been rolled out. The sign from VAERS is so clear there’s merely little question now we have a security drawback on our palms.

Can COVID Photographs Trigger Loss of life?

As famous by McCullough, there’s a really tight temporality to the photographs in most deaths. Half have occurred inside 48 hours of injection, and 80% have died inside one week of their jab (be it the primary, second or third dose).6

Temporality is among the 10 Bradford Hill standards used to ascertain causal relationship. In an effort to be causative, one occasion should happen earlier than one other, and the shorter the period between the 2 occasions, the upper the chance of a causative impact.

In June 2021, Scott McLachlan, Ph.D., on the College of London revealed an evaluation7 of VAERS dying reviews concluding that 86% of post-jab deaths could possibly be attributed to the photographs. There was no different rationalization for the deaths. McLachlan additionally checked out who’s getting killed by the photographs and, sadly, it’s the identical individuals the photographs are meant to guard — our seniors.

In September 2021, Ronald Kostoff, Ph.D., revealed a report8 that additionally confirmed seniors have been dying from the jab at far increased charges than different age teams. As famous by McCullough, this makes good sense as a result of individuals die from COVID-19 as a result of affect of the spike protein. Why would anybody assume they may survive having it produced in their very own our bodies?

Utilizing the best-case situation cost-benefit evaluation, Kostoff estimates that individuals aged 65 and older are 5 occasions extra more likely to die of the COVID shot than from COVID-19 itself.

The explanation for it is because if you happen to take the shot, you’re assured to be uncovered to its dangers, however you’re not assured to get COVID-19 if you happen to don’t take the shot. It’s possible you’ll be uncovered, or you might not. And never everybody develops a extreme an infection even when instantly uncovered.

COVID Jab-Related Myocarditis in Youngsters

In early September 2021, Tracy Beth Hoeg and colleagues posted an evaluation9 of VAERS knowledge on the preprint server medRxiv, exhibiting that greater than 86% of the youngsters aged 12 to 17 who reported signs of myocarditis have been extreme sufficient to require hospitalization.

Additionally they concluded that wholesome boys have a “significantly increased” probability of being hospitalized with myocarditis post-jab than they’re of requiring hospitalization for COVID-19.

Based on McCullough, the FDA has heard these knowledge twice in 2021 and by no means disputed them. But they’ve proceeded with suggestions to present the COVID jab to anybody with a pulse over the age of 5. It’s simply surprising. Traditionally, as a rule, we’ve by no means given medication to individuals once they’re extra more likely to hurt than present a profit.

What Hoeg et. al.10 confirmed is that instances of myocarditis explode after the second shot, and disproportionally have an effect on boys. A full 90% of post-jab myocarditis reviews are males, and 85% of reviews occurred after the second dose. Based on Hoeg et. al.:11

“The estimated incidence of CAEs [cardiac adverse events] amongst boys aged 12-15 years following the second dose was 162 per million; the incidence amongst boys aged 16-17 years was 94 per million. The estimated incidence of CAEs amongst women was 13 per million in each age teams.

The incidence of CAEs was significantly decrease after the primary dose throughout all age and intercourse teams. Median peak troponin was 5.2 ng/mL amongst boys aged 12-15 years, 11.6 ng/mL amongst boys aged 16-17 years, 0.8 ng/mL amongst women aged 12-15 years, and seven.3 ng/mL amongst women aged 16-17 years.”

Troponin Ranges Reveal Large Coronary heart Harm

Troponin is a protein that helps regulate contractions of your coronary heart and skeletal muscle tissue. It’s a biomarker for coronary heart harm, as your coronary heart releases troponin in response to an damage. Elevated troponin is used to evaluate whether or not you’ve had a coronary heart assault, for instance.

Regular troponin ranges are practically undetectable, so even small will increase can point out coronary heart harm. A stage above 0.4 ng/mL is often indicative of a coronary heart assault and something between 0.04 ng/mL and 0.4 ng/mL signifies there’s some sort of drawback with the center.12

So, the sky excessive post-jab troponin ranges in these adolescent boys is something however inconsequential. It could completely be life-threatening. Myocarditis may end up in sudden dying, as illustrated in an October 2021 case report13 from Korea, the place the dying of a 22-year-old man from acute myocarditis was causally linked to the Pfizer shot.

“Definitely, it should kill youngsters,” McCullough says. Even when not acutely deadly, myocarditis can considerably decrease your life expectancy. Traditionally, the three- to five-year survival price for myocarditis has ranged from 56% to 83%.14 Meaning a sure proportion don’t make it previous 5 years as a result of their coronary heart is simply too broken.

McCullough and Rose have additionally tried to publish an evaluation on this subject. They submitted a paper15 on myocarditis instances in VAERS following the COVID jabs to the journal Present Issues in Cardiology. However after initially accepting the paper, the journal abruptly modified its thoughts.

You’ll be able to nonetheless discover the pre-proof on Rose’s web site although. What they present is that post-jab myocarditis is inversely correlated to age, so the chance will get increased the youthful you’re. They too discovered there’s a dose-dependent danger, with boys having a six-fold larger danger of myocarditis following the second dose.

Mortality in Adolescents Is Skyrocketing

McCullough’s assertion that the shot will kill some youngsters can be beginning to present in statistics. British knowledge, for instance, exhibits deaths amongst youngsters have spiked since that age group grew to become eligible for the COVID photographs.16

Between the week ending June 26 and the week ending September 18, 2020, 148 deaths have been reported amongst 15- to 19-year-olds. Throughout that very same time interval in 2021, 217 deaths occurred in that age group. That’s a rise of 47%, which has but to be defined.

Deaths from COVID-19 additionally went up amongst 15- to 19-year-olds after the photographs have been rolled out. Important issues have been raised in regards to the chance that COVID jabs may worsen COVID-19 illness through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).17 Is that what’s happening right here? As reported by The Exposé, which carried out the investigation:18

“Correlation doesn’t equal causation, however this can be very regarding to see that deaths have elevated by 47% amongst teenagers over the age of 15, and COVID-19 deaths have additionally elevated amongst this age group since they began receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, and it’s maybe one coincidence too far.”

COVID Jabs Double Danger of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Except for troponin ranges, researchers have additionally discovered Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 photographs dramatically enhance different biomarkers related to thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and different vascular occasions following injection.19

Individuals who had obtained two doses of the mRNA jab greater than doubled their five-year danger of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the researchers discovered, driving it from a mean of 11% to 25%. ACS is an umbrella time period that features not solely coronary heart assaults, but in addition a spread of different situations involving abruptly decreased blood move to your coronary heart.

In Months, the Jabs’ Effectiveness Wanes to Zero

As needs to be evident by now, there are vital dangers to those COVID photographs. However what in regards to the profit aspect of the equation? As famous by McCullough, whereas the photographs cut back the chance of dying from COVID-19, the profit is vanishingly small.

Plenty of papers have been revealed calculating absolutely the danger discount of the photographs, exhibiting the 4 obtainable COVID jabs within the U.S. present an absolute danger discount between simply 0.7% and 1.3%.20,21

McCullough goes on to quote a December 1, 2021, New England Journal of Drugs research22 that in contrast the effectiveness of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s injections amongst hospitalized veterans. Right here too, they discovered that the photographs had an effectiveness of lower than 1% towards all COVID-19 occasions, over the course of six months.

As of the top of October 2021, we had 22 research exhibiting the photographs’ efficacy towards all variants quickly wane over the course of three to 6 months, finally hitting zero.

For instance, a Swedish research23 revealed October 25, 2021, checked out knowledge from 842,974 pairs, the place every one that had obtained two COVID jabs was paired and in contrast towards an unvaccinated particular person, to see if the vaccinated had fewer symptomatic instances and hospitalizations.

Early on, the double-jabbed appeared to have respectable safety, however that rapidly modified. The Pfizer jab went from 92% effectiveness at Day 15 by means of 30, to 47% at Day 121 by means of 180, and nil from Day 201 onward. The Moderna shot had an identical trajectory, being estimated at 59% from Day 181 onward.

The AstraZeneca injection had a decrease effectiveness out of the gate, waned sooner than the mRNA photographs, and had no detectable effectiveness as of Day 121. All of the whereas, thousands and thousands of People have already had COVID24 and have pure immunity that doesn’t wane on this method.

“Vaccines aren’t viable if they will’t final a 12 months!” McCullough exclaims. “The minimal standards to simply accept a vaccine … is 50% protection and it should final one 12 months. These [COVID shots] aren’t chopping it. None of them are viable to be business merchandise.”

The COVID-Jabbed Are Simply as Infectious because the Unvaccinated

COVID jab mandates are much more irrational while you have in mind the truth that they don’t stop you from being contaminated, and research have repeatedly proven that if you end up contaminated, you could have the identical or increased viral load as unvaccinated people. What which means is you’re simply as infectious as an unvaccinated particular person.

What’s extra, as famous in a letter25 to the editor of The New England Journal of Drugs, the photographs even have solely minor affect on viral clearance. In the event you get the COVID shot and are available down with COVID, you is likely to be sick for a day or so lower than somebody who’s unvaccinated.

We Should Deal with COVID Sufferers Early

McCullough closes out his presentation going over the all-important problem of early therapy. You should deal with COVID early and aggressively. You additionally must hit it from a number of sides. No single drug can successfully deal with all points of this an infection (though the Omicron variant doesn’t seem to have any of the blood clotting and low oxygen points related to the earliest strains).

Only a few individuals want die from COVID so long as they get acceptable therapy early sufficient. The truth that our well being authorities are to today refusing to acknowledge profitable therapy protocols is nothing wanting against the law.

If you wish to reside, and if you’d like your loved ones and pals to reside, you’d be smart to disregard the CDC’s and FDA’s advice to attend till you’ll be able to’t breathe after which go to the hospital, the place they’ll offer you poisonous remdesivir and deadly air flow. As a substitute, arm your self with a number of early therapy protocols and be sure you have the fundamentals in your medication cupboard. Protocols you should use embrace:

I reviewed all of those protocols and consider the FLCCC’s is the best and best. I’ve posted a abstract of it beneath. Nevertheless, I’ve altered a few of the suggestions. Particularly, I like to recommend:

Reducing zinc dose from 100 mg to 50 mg elemental zinc, however just for three days, then lower to fifteen mg elemental zinc.

Rising quercetin from 250 mg to 500 mg.

Add NAC to 500 mg per day.

When utilizing vitamin C, I like to recommend liposomal vitamin C, 1,000 to 2,000 mg, 4 to 6 occasions per day.

When utilizing honey, be sure it’s uncooked, not regular honey from the grocery retailer. Uncooked honey might be obtained on-line or at a well being meals retailer.

Add fibrinolytic enzymes like lumbrokinase, serrapeptidase or nattokinase, two to 4 tablets, two to 3 occasions a day, on an empty abdomen (one hour earlier than or two hours after a meal). It will assist break down any microclots and can be utilized in lieu of aspirin.

I’ve additionally added a few therapies that they’ve but to incorporate:

  • Nebulized hydrogen peroxide — Nebulize 5 ml of 0.1% peroxide dissolved in 0.9% regular saline each hour or two. It’s greatest to make use of a nebulizer that plugs into the wall, as these are simpler than battery operated ones.
  • Intravenous ozone administered by a educated ozone doctor.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Electronic Vault
Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)